From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
Cc: jic23@cam.ac.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com,
plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
b.brezillon@overkiz.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:43:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521FB26A.504@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377602932-1899-2-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com>
On 08/27/13 12:28, Josh Wu wrote:
> The adc_clk variable is currently defined using a 32-bits unsigned integer,
> which will overflow under some very valid range of operations.
>
> Such overflow will occur if, for example, the parent clock is set to a
> 20MHz frequency and the ADC startup time is larger than 215ns.
>
> To fix this, introduce an intermediate variable holding the clock rate
> in kHz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git
Please in future separate out new stuff and fixes into separate series.
I tend to leave large series to review when I have time to do the whole
thing whereas little fixes in theory at least get picked up fast.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> v1 --> v2:
> refined the commit message.
>
> drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index b6db6a0..9cf8ab5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static const struct iio_info at91_adc_info = {
>
> static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - unsigned int prsc, mstrclk, ticks, adc_clk, shtim;
> + unsigned int prsc, mstrclk, ticks, adc_clk, adc_clk_khz, shtim;
> int ret;
> struct iio_dev *idev;
> struct at91_adc_state *st;
> @@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> */
> mstrclk = clk_get_rate(st->clk);
> adc_clk = clk_get_rate(st->adc_clk);
> + adc_clk_khz = adc_clk / 1000;
> prsc = (mstrclk / (2 * adc_clk)) - 1;
>
> if (!st->startup_time) {
> @@ -693,15 +694,15 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * defined in the electrical characteristics of the board, divided by 8.
> * The formula thus is : Startup Time = (ticks + 1) * 8 / ADC Clock
> */
> - ticks = round_up((st->startup_time * adc_clk /
> - 1000000) - 1, 8) / 8;
> + ticks = round_up((st->startup_time * adc_clk_khz /
> + 1000) - 1, 8) / 8;
> /*
> * a minimal Sample and Hold Time is necessary for the ADC to guarantee
> * the best converted final value between two channels selection
> * The formula thus is : Sample and Hold Time = (shtim + 1) / ADCClock
> */
> - shtim = round_up((st->sample_hold_time * adc_clk /
> - 1000000) - 1, 1);
> + shtim = round_up((st->sample_hold_time * adc_clk_khz /
> + 1000) - 1, 1);
>
> reg = AT91_ADC_PRESCAL_(prsc) & AT91_ADC_PRESCAL;
> reg |= AT91_ADC_STARTUP_(ticks) & AT91_ADC_STARTUP;
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jic23@kernel.org (Jonathan Cameron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:43:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521FB26A.504@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377602932-1899-2-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com>
On 08/27/13 12:28, Josh Wu wrote:
> The adc_clk variable is currently defined using a 32-bits unsigned integer,
> which will overflow under some very valid range of operations.
>
> Such overflow will occur if, for example, the parent clock is set to a
> 20MHz frequency and the ADC startup time is larger than 215ns.
>
> To fix this, introduce an intermediate variable holding the clock rate
> in kHz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git
Please in future separate out new stuff and fixes into separate series.
I tend to leave large series to review when I have time to do the whole
thing whereas little fixes in theory at least get picked up fast.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> v1 --> v2:
> refined the commit message.
>
> drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index b6db6a0..9cf8ab5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static const struct iio_info at91_adc_info = {
>
> static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - unsigned int prsc, mstrclk, ticks, adc_clk, shtim;
> + unsigned int prsc, mstrclk, ticks, adc_clk, adc_clk_khz, shtim;
> int ret;
> struct iio_dev *idev;
> struct at91_adc_state *st;
> @@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> */
> mstrclk = clk_get_rate(st->clk);
> adc_clk = clk_get_rate(st->adc_clk);
> + adc_clk_khz = adc_clk / 1000;
> prsc = (mstrclk / (2 * adc_clk)) - 1;
>
> if (!st->startup_time) {
> @@ -693,15 +694,15 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * defined in the electrical characteristics of the board, divided by 8.
> * The formula thus is : Startup Time = (ticks + 1) * 8 / ADC Clock
> */
> - ticks = round_up((st->startup_time * adc_clk /
> - 1000000) - 1, 8) / 8;
> + ticks = round_up((st->startup_time * adc_clk_khz /
> + 1000) - 1, 8) / 8;
> /*
> * a minimal Sample and Hold Time is necessary for the ADC to guarantee
> * the best converted final value between two channels selection
> * The formula thus is : Sample and Hold Time = (shtim + 1) / ADCClock
> */
> - shtim = round_up((st->sample_hold_time * adc_clk /
> - 1000000) - 1, 1);
> + shtim = round_up((st->sample_hold_time * adc_clk_khz /
> + 1000) - 1, 1);
>
> reg = AT91_ADC_PRESCAL_(prsc) & AT91_ADC_PRESCAL;
> reg |= AT91_ADC_STARTUP_(ticks) & AT91_ADC_STARTUP;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-29 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-27 11:28 [PATCH v3 0/6] iio: at91: Add touch screen support in at91 adc Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-29 20:43 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2013-08-29 20:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] iio: at91: introduce the multiple compatible string for different IPs Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 8:02 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:02 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:02 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-29 20:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 20:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 20:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-28 13:25 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-28 13:25 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-28 13:25 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] iio: at91: Use different prescal, startup mask in MR for different IP Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 8:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-29 20:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 20:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] iio: at91: ADC start-up time calculation changed since at91sam9x5 Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 9:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 9:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-29 21:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 21:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-10-01 9:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-10-01 9:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-10-08 3:44 ` Josh Wu
2013-10-08 3:44 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] iio: at91: move the num_channels from DT to driver itself Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:42 ` [resend][PATCH " Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:42 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:42 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 13:27 ` [PATCH " Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-28 13:27 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-28 13:27 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] iio: at91: introduce touch screen support in iio adc driver Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:45 ` [resend][PATCH " Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:45 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:45 ` Josh Wu
2013-09-13 9:32 ` Josh Wu
2013-09-13 9:32 ` Josh Wu
2013-09-13 9:32 ` Josh Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521FB26A.504@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.