From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
b.brezillon@overkiz.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] iio: at91: ADC start-up time calculation changed since at91sam9x5
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:00:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521FB660.8010607@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130828090354.GP2695@lukather>
On 08/28/13 10:03, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:28:50PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> Since in at91sam9x5, sama5d3x chip. the start up time calucation is changed. This patch can choose different
>> start up time calculation formula for different chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>
Unfortunately this one has a dependency on the fix patch which is going in through
my fixes branch so will have to wait until that hits my upstream.
I'd like 5 and 6 to sit a while longer anyway (and 6 needs Dmitry's sign off before
I take that.)
Thanks for these,
Jonathan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jic23@kernel.org (Jonathan Cameron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] iio: at91: ADC start-up time calculation changed since at91sam9x5
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:00:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521FB660.8010607@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130828090354.GP2695@lukather>
On 08/28/13 10:03, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:28:50PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> Since in at91sam9x5, sama5d3x chip. the start up time calucation is changed. This patch can choose different
>> start up time calculation formula for different chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>
Unfortunately this one has a dependency on the fix patch which is going in through
my fixes branch so will have to wait until that hits my upstream.
I'd like 5 and 6 to sit a while longer anyway (and 6 needs Dmitry's sign off before
I take that.)
Thanks for these,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-29 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-27 11:28 [PATCH v3 0/6] iio: at91: Add touch screen support in at91 adc Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-29 20:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 20:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] iio: at91: introduce the multiple compatible string for different IPs Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 8:02 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:02 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:02 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-29 20:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 20:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 20:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-28 13:25 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-28 13:25 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-28 13:25 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] iio: at91: Use different prescal, startup mask in MR for different IP Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 8:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-29 20:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 20:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] iio: at91: ADC start-up time calculation changed since at91sam9x5 Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 9:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 9:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-29 21:00 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2013-08-29 21:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-10-01 9:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-10-01 9:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-10-08 3:44 ` Josh Wu
2013-10-08 3:44 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] iio: at91: move the num_channels from DT to driver itself Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:42 ` [resend][PATCH " Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:42 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:42 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-08-28 13:27 ` [PATCH " Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-28 13:27 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-28 13:27 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] iio: at91: introduce touch screen support in iio adc driver Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-27 11:28 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:45 ` [resend][PATCH " Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:45 ` Josh Wu
2013-08-28 7:45 ` Josh Wu
2013-09-13 9:32 ` Josh Wu
2013-09-13 9:32 ` Josh Wu
2013-09-13 9:32 ` Josh Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521FB660.8010607@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \
--cc=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.