From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] bonding: Patchset for rcu use in bonding
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:37:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521FF755.6050306@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521F5AA3.4030105@redhat.com>
On 2013/8/29 22:28, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 06:20 AM, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> The Patch Set convert the xmit of 3ad and alb mode to use rcu lock.
>> replace and add more rcu list function.
>> fix a bug to protect bonding_store_xmit_hash().
>>
>> I test well and no problems found till now.
>>
>> Ding Tianhong (3):
>> Wang Yufen (1):
>> Yang Yingliang (1):
>> bonding: simplify and use RCU protection for 3ad xmit path
>> bonding: replace read_lock to rcu_read_lock for
>> bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info()
>> bonding: add rtnl lock for bonding_store_xmit_hash
>> bonding: restructure and simplify bond_for_each_slave_next()
>> bonding: use RCU protection for alb xmit path
>>
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 35 +++++++++++++++-------------------
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 23 ++++++++++------------
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 ++----
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 4 ++++
>> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
> Thanks for the work, I was on vacation and travelling after my initial RCU
> conversion so I got a little behind with these conversions, my idea was quite
> different :-)
> Anyway, I'd also appreciate some benchmarks, also some more information on what
> type of testing did you run ?
> I've given some preliminary comments to the patches, I'll have to think more
> about them in this form.
>
> Cheers,
> Nik
>
> .
It looks like a wonderful vocation :).
I focus on the 3ad and alb mode, because the modify was manly for xmit, so my test environment was consist of 4 Intel82599 10G card, and use mode lacp ,alb.
I use iperf to test, after the patch, the performance was a little better and no problem
occurs.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-30 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-28 4:20 [PATCH 0/5] bonding: Patchset for rcu use in bonding Ding Tianhong
2013-08-29 14:28 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-08-30 1:37 ` Ding Tianhong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521FF755.6050306@huawei.com \
--to=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.