From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47097)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VFIMt-0001t2-St
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 02:39:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VFIMl-0000e8-Fg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 02:39:39 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22a]:54248)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VFIMl-0000dz-8z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 02:39:31 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b45so694270eek.15
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52203E1C.4060208@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:39:24 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1377170965-9905-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
	<1377170965-9905-4-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
	<1377703099.10408.71.camel@ul30vt.home>
	<521E9DF5.9080709@ozlabs.ru>
	<1377740545.10408.145.camel@ul30vt.home>
	<521EB16F.9010303@ozlabs.ru> <521EEA64.7000708@redhat.com>
	<521EF0FD.5080906@ozlabs.ru> <521F0B5C.3090102@redhat.com>
	<52203889.40307@ozlabs.ru>
In-Reply-To: <52203889.40307@ozlabs.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] vfio: Fix 128 bit handling
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Il 30/08/2013 08:15, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> > What if you just merge the two series together?
> It will still be a function which can accept sections bigger than 2^64 and
> theoretically call int128_get64() and assert. I would think that every time
> when anyone calls int128_get64(), the value should be checked for <2^64. It
> is like division by zero :)

I understood that int128_get64() would be called only for RAM sections,
not for IOMMUs (and RAM sections cannot be 2^64-bytes large).  Is this
wrong?

Paolo