From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <52207471.4020908@siemens.com> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:31:13 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <521F409D.4070507@siemens.com> <52204A62.7040005@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Virtualization with Xenomai List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Asier Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 2013-08-30 12:22, Asier wrote: > Once again, thank you.Your last email was really helpful. > > If I understand it correctly, for my system it is better to use the KVM > approach, that is, leave the Xenomai Linux running on top of the HW and the > Windows on KVM. Though this solution may have some overhead, the real-time > behaviour will be the same as before. Am I correct? Yes, you are. > Or it can't be said for > sure? > > Regarding the Xenomai-aware Linux distributions, I'll have a look at the > debian packages for Xenomai. ELDK has no Intel support. I may consider > WindRiver Linux and Enea Linux, as well as using the Yocto tools themselves. You might be able to "steal" a Xenomai recipe from ELDK. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux