Sorry for didn't get a chance to follow up with this sooner. Ok, I see
> the code you mentioned.
> However, if I understand this correctly, it is also mapping the bridge
> to the domU
> along with the end-device. This is not the same as what you mentioned
> that the bridge should
> be mapped to only Dom0.
I don't think I ever said this. Whether we're talking about DomU or
Dom0 here is irrelevant. I'm just pointing out that bridges do get
mappings established for them whenever a device behind them gets
mapped.
Jan