From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
To: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/trace: Correcting and extending tracepoint documentation
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:02:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5224C4B7.6090003@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377421194.2737.118@driftwood>
Hi,
I'm not very familiar with the tracing framework, but I will try to
comment on your questions.
On 25/08/13 09:59, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 04:49:31 PM, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>> +#if !defined(_TRACE_SUBSYS_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
>> +#define _TRACE_SUBSYS_H
>
> But this makes no sense to me: why is it needed? (I.E. why must it be
> block copied into each _user_ of tracepoints?)
This is to prevent header reinclusion, the second condition makes it
possible to include it again from trace/define_trace.h
>> #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
>>
>> @@ -48,10 +54,16 @@ DECLARE_TRACE(subsys_eventname,
>> TP_PROTO(int firstarg, struct task_struct *p),
>> TP_ARGS(firstarg, p));
>>
>> +#endif /* _TRACE_SUBSYS_H */
>> +
>> +/* This part must be outside protection */
>> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
>> +
>
> Why? (Both why do you need to #include a header outside a multiple
> inclusion guard, and why is the additional header needed at all in
> _every_ subsystem trace header?)
I see only one inclusion guard here, the one above. define_trace.h
should take effect at only one place, where CREATE_TRACE_POINTS is
defined, to create the tracepoints exactly once. However I don't see as
well why it should be outside protection. Maybe because the intentional
header reinclusion in it?
Regards,
Zoli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 21:49 [PATCH] Documentation/trace: Correcting and extending tracepoint documentation Zoltan Kiss
2013-08-24 18:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-08-27 8:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-08-25 8:59 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-02 17:02 ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]
2013-09-02 17:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-07 2:44 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5224C4B7.6090003@citrix.com \
--to=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.