From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Li, Fei" <fei.li@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"holt@sgi.com" <holt@sgi.com>,
"rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk" <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reboot: perform warm/cold reset correctly for CF9 type
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:35:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52261DC8.4070307@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BEC9F67575FA1E429CA7CF5AE9BE3634012EDD40@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 08/21/2013 08:32 PM, Li, Fei wrote:
>
> In fact, ACPI method also implements reset by writing RESET_VALUE into RESET_REG
> port. In our platform, it also uses port 0xCF9. The difference between cold and wart reset
> is whether power cycle is involved or not. After all, this is another topic.
>
> From the source code, CF9 boot method are still used by some apple MAC and dell
> platforms if I understand correctly.
>
> Back to our patch, if you really concern the effect of cold reboot 0x0E to current existed
> platforms, we can set the default value of reboot_mode as REBOOT_WARM.
>
> Does it make sense?
>
Sort-of-kind-of.
The problem here is that "cold" versus "warm" reboot seems to have
slightly different meanings for BIOS (bypass POST) and the CF9 register
(where I presume it is a "deeper" platform reset of some kind ... is it
even well-defined what the semantics are?)
I could be wrong and the cold/warm reset values in CF9 end up having
exactly the same function as the magic BIOS signature does; if so, then
I would like to be told so explicitly, ideally with an explanation about
how it works on the hw level (or a pointer to relevant documentation,
Intel internal docs are fine.)
Finally, again, does this solve a real problem?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 1:52 [PATCH] reboot: perform warm/cold reset correctly for CF9 type Li Fei
2013-08-21 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-21 7:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-21 8:08 ` Li, Fei
2013-08-21 9:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-22 3:32 ` Li, Fei
2013-09-03 17:35 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-09-09 1:53 ` Liu, Chuansheng
2013-09-09 2:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-21 8:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Li Fei
2013-09-10 19:51 ` [tip:x86/reboot] reboot: Allow specifying warm/ cold reset for CF9 boot type tip-bot for Li Fei
2013-09-25 17:36 ` tip-bot for Li Fei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52261DC8.4070307@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=fei.li@intel.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.