All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@iki.fi>
To: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, penberg@kernel.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, Matt.Evans@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kvm tools: remove periodic tick
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:23:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5226FC02.4060404@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378231855-13834-1-git-send-email-jonathan.austin@arm.com>

On 9/3/13 9:10 PM, Jonathan Austin wrote:
> This patch series removes kvm tool's periodic tick function in favour of a
> thread that blocks waiting for input. The paths used for handling input are the
> same as when using a periodic tick, but they're not called unless there is
> actually input to be processed.
>
> On extremely slow platforms (eg FPGAs) the overhead involved in handling the
> timer tick means it is possible to make progress at all inside the VM! This
> patch addresses this problem.
>
> In doing this there are a number of small tidyups/cleanups that made sense, too:
> - Use a #define for maximum number of term devices
> - Refactor the method by which the virtio console handles input in order not to
>    - handle input too early
>    - handle input multiple times if the worker thread didn't immediately start
>      work.
> - Rename the periodic_poll function to reflect the functional change
>
> Jonathan Austin (3):
>    kvm tools: use #define for maximum number of terminal devices
>    kvm tools: remove periodic tick in favour of a polling thread
>    kvm tools: stop virtio console doing unnecessary input handling
>
>   tools/kvm/arm/kvm.c         |    2 +-
>   tools/kvm/builtin-run.c     |   13 -----------
>   tools/kvm/include/kvm/kvm.h |    2 +-
>   tools/kvm/kvm.c             |   50 -------------------------------------------
>   tools/kvm/powerpc/kvm.c     |    2 +-
>   tools/kvm/term.c            |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   tools/kvm/virtio/console.c  |   23 +++++++++++++++++---
>   tools/kvm/x86/kvm.c         |    2 +-
>   8 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

Seems reasonable to me. Marc, Will?

                         Pekka


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-04  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-03 18:10 [PATCH 0/3] kvm tools: remove periodic tick Jonathan Austin
2013-09-03 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvm tools: use #define for maximum number of terminal devices Jonathan Austin
2013-09-03 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] kvm tools: remove periodic tick in favour of a polling thread Jonathan Austin
2013-09-04  9:48   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-09-03 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] kvm tools: stop virtio console doing unnecessary input handling Jonathan Austin
2013-09-04  9:23 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2013-09-04  9:58   ` [PATCH 0/3] kvm tools: remove periodic tick Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5226FC02.4060404@iki.fi \
    --to=penberg@iki.fi \
    --cc=Matt.Evans@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathan.austin@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.