From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54239)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1VHCl5-0000hy-CG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:04:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1VHCkx-0008Hz-9z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:04:31 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55719 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1VHCkx-0008Hu-3b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:04:23 -0400
Message-ID: <52272FD1.5030906@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:04:17 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1375366359-11553-1-git-send-email-jjherne@us.ibm.com>
	<52272B78.3010804@suse.de> <20130904085647.03532941@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130904085647.03532941@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: agraf@suse.de, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com, imammedo@redhat.com

Am 04.09.2013 14:56, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:45:44 +0200
> Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>=20
>> For the HMP patch I am waiting on feedback from Igor once he returns
>> from his vacation and, if there are no objections, would like to see
>> that patch go through Luiz' queue since unrelated to s390x.
>=20
> I don't remember seeing that patch, I was CC'ed?

Originally no, but you added a Reviewed-by after I CC'ed you. :)

Apart from me not being familiar with the HMP infrastructure, I was
wondering if there was a reason why this wasn't done from the start.

So we don't have some only-new-QMP-commands policy and people are
encouraged to implement an HMP command when they do a QMP command?

Cheers,
Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg