From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHgHN-0000hN-FC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:35:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHgHD-00070A-Dk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:35:49 -0400 Received: from [2a03:4000:1::4e2f:c7ac:d] (port=46080 helo=v220110690675601.yourvserver.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHgHD-0006zz-2Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:35:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (v220110690675601.yourvserver.net.local [127.0.0.1]) by v220110690675601.yourvserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7C072819E7 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 22:35:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (v220110690675601.yourvserver.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pJi1N-hbVOnI for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 22:35:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.35] (p54AD859C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.133.156]) by v220110690675601.yourvserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 499BF72819E3 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 22:35:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5228EB17.4050209@weilnetz.de> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 22:35:35 +0200 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [Bug] qemu-sparc64 broken List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel Here is the result of running Debian's busybox-static for sparc64: $ sparc64-linux-user/qemu-sparc64 /usr/gnemul/qemu-sparc64/bin/busybox ls -l block.c ?rwxr-x--T 1 stefan root 1378329541 Jan 1 1970 block.c It's obviously wrong. All other user emulations return the correct result: $ busybox ls -l block.c -rw-r--r-- 1 stefan stefan 131462 Sep 3 21:13 block.c In a first analysis of this, I noticed that it is impossible to run qemu-sparc64 under gdb (raised fatal signal). I was also surprised to see that target_stat64 is unused. Regards, Stefan