From: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jlinton@tributary.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] lpfc 8.3.42: Fixed issue of task management commands having a fixed timeout
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 09:59:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522C82DF.2000305@emulex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522A2125.9040406@tributary.com>
Jeremy,
Different issues....
The patch addresses only 1 topic - making an attribute to change the
timeout for the TMF. This was a request by the distros to post a hack
that was used on older releases to work around all the serialization and
delay problems in the midlayer error recovery path - which allowed
shortening delays from 10-12 minutes to 1-2 minutes. These are the same
issues we discussed at the last storage forum and which Hannes has been
working to correct upstream. The desire is to continue with a like
tuning option in the driver for those customers that have used it in the
past.
The other issue - we seem to have missed your prior post. I'll look into
it shortly.
The two patches work on the same code, but are independent topics.
-- james
On 9/6/2013 2:38 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> On 9/6/2013 11:22 AM, James Smart wrote:
>> Fixed issue of task management commands having a fixed timeout
> I'm surprised about this change, since it appears a number of issues in the
> send_taskmgmt() still exist that keep it from handling task management
> failures correctly. It also continues to have a number of smaller issues like
> for example dead code of the form
>
> if (status != IOCB_STATUS)
> else if (status == IOCB_BUSY)
> else
>
>
> See patch:
>
> "lpfc should check return status for task mgmt IOCB"
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=136242124409687
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-08 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 16:22 [PATCH 17/18] lpfc 8.3.42: Fixed issue of task management commands having a fixed timeout James Smart
2013-09-06 18:38 ` Jeremy Linton
2013-09-08 13:59 ` James Smart [this message]
2013-09-09 14:43 ` Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522C82DF.2000305@emulex.com \
--to=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=jlinton@tributary.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.