From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cpufreq <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cpufreq_stats NULL deref on second system suspend
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:44:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523169E1.60304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohponrmV4CFqicEw7tf0g47VNcVY=4mmcH1CnGX388iFYb=g@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/12/2013 12:22 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 September 2013 12:16, Srivatsa S. Bhat
> <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Of course, if we change the suspend/resume sequence and that fixes this, that
>> would be like getting it for free, nobody would say no to it ;-)
>
> Not really :)
>
> Policy with 4 CPUs, 0,1,2,3, policy->cpu currently set to 1, 2 or 3...
>
> We will remove CPUs in order 3,2,1 and add back in 1,2,3... Or Vice Versa
>
> policy->cpu after resume is 0 :)
>
Ah, great counter-example! :-)
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-09 19:22 cpufreq_stats NULL deref on second system suspend Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-09 20:01 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-09 21:29 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 23:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 20:53 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-10 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-11 10:21 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 10:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11 10:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11 11:14 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 11:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11 13:56 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 5:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 6:26 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 6:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 6:46 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 6:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 7:14 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2013-09-12 15:55 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-12 17:26 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-13 4:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11 11:10 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 11:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11 11:17 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 11:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11 11:09 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 16:05 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-11 18:03 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 18:42 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 19:03 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-11 19:46 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 20:07 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-11 20:05 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 6:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 6:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 5:58 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523169E1.60304@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.