From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>,
"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: use correct values of cpus in __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:46:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52316A40.4050600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomCXoO20cQyCrWtN0WgWnzvVmEqFxuwTU8V0GpXsQxgHw@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/12/2013 12:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 September 2013 12:17, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Currently cpus never become zero as we clear mask only while there are
>> more than one cpu in a policy... Wait let me see what's the cleanest way
>> to get this fixed..
>
> Okay, simply replace cpumask_first() with cpumask_any_but() in
> cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu() :)
>
That sounds good! Even the naming is much better, it conveys the intent
clearly.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-12 5:25 [PATCH 0/5] cpufreq: Last minute fixes for 3.12 Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 5:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: Remove extra blank line Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 8:16 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 10:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 5:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: don't break string in print statements Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 8:11 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 5:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: remove __cpufreq_remove_dev() Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 8:09 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 5:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: don't update policy->cpu while removing while removing other CPUs Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 8:13 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 5:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: use correct values of cpus in __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish() Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 6:40 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 6:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 6:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 7:16 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2013-09-12 9:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 10:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12 10:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 10:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12 10:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 18:08 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-17 15:20 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-17 16:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-17 18:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-18 4:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 10:05 ` [PATCH 0/5] cpufreq: Last minute fixes for 3.12 Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52316A40.4050600@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.