From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nate Studer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add ARINC653 scheduler maintainers. Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:34:22 -0400 Message-ID: <5231C2DE.5080101@dornerworks.com> References: <1378935730-9425-1-git-send-email-nate.studer@dornerworks.com> <5231873702000078000F29CF@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VK73v-0004lH-G9 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:35:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5231873702000078000F29CF@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel , kathy.hadley@dornerworks.com, robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 9/12/2013 3:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 11.09.13 at 23:42, Nathan Studer wrote: >> From: Nathan Studer >> >> Previously the ARINC653 scheduler was indirectly maintained by >> Kathy Hadley and Josh Holtrop being cc'd on changes by George >> Dunlap. Maintenance is currently being done by Robert VanVossen >> and myself. To avoid potential communication problems in the >> future, make Robbie and I the official maintainers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nathan Studer >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> mode change 100644 => 100755 MAINTAINERS >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> old mode 100644 >> new mode 100755 >> index 843f9e3..ad9bb94 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -251,6 +251,13 @@ M: George Dunlap >> S: Supported >> F: xen/common/sched* >> >> +ARINC653 SCHEDULER >> +M: Nathan Studer >> +M: Robert VanVossen >> +S: Supported >> +F: xen/common/sched_arinc653.c >> +F: tools/libxc/xc_arinc653.c >> + >> SEABIOS UPSTREAM >> M: Ian Campbell >> S: Supported > > Did you perhaps overlook that the file is (at least attempted to > be) organized alphabetically? Indeed, I did fail to notice this. > > Also, for the tools side change - in order to get the current formal > maintainers' ack - you should also have Cc-ed the tools maintainers. > > Jan > I will CC the tool maintainers, after respinning to fix the alphabetic ordering issue. Nate