From: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
"Brunck, Holger" <Holger.Brunck@keymile.com>,
"Longchamp, Valentin" <Valentin.Longchamp@keymile.com>,
"Bigler, Stefan" <Stefan.Bigler@keymile.com>,
sboyd@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: kernel deadlock
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5231D2CF.5080400@keymile.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130909100853.GJ31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
sorry for the slow response...
On 09/09/2013 12:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:26:19AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> Enabling the SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK, true) bit tends to cause lots of issues
>> on the various hardware I have, tripping the lockdep warnings on various
>> other issues:
>
> Does whatever kernel you guys are running have this commit:
That didn't seem to make a difference (it had already been pointed out
by Stephen Boyd).
In any case, latest patch from John fixes the problem... Hooray! :-)
Thanks again John!
Gerlando
>
> ---
> commit 971ee28cbd1ccd87b3164facd9359a534c1d2892
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Fri Jun 28 11:18:53 2013 +0200
>
> sched: Fix HRTICK
>
> David reported that the HRTICK sched feature was borken; which was enough
> motivation for me to finally fix it ;-)
>
> We should not allow hrtimer code to do softirq wakeups while holding scheduler
> locks. The hrtimer code only needs this when we accidentally try to program an
> expired time. We don't much care about those anyway since we have the regular
> tick to fall back to.
>
> Reported-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130628091853.GE29209@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9b1f2e5..0d8eb45 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -370,13 +370,6 @@ static struct rq *this_rq_lock(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK
> /*
> * Use HR-timers to deliver accurate preemption points.
> - *
> - * Its all a bit involved since we cannot program an hrt while holding the
> - * rq->lock. So what we do is store a state in in rq->hrtick_* and ask for a
> - * reschedule event.
> - *
> - * When we get rescheduled we reprogram the hrtick_timer outside of the
> - * rq->lock.
> */
>
> static void hrtick_clear(struct rq *rq)
> @@ -404,6 +397,15 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart hrtick(struct hrtimer *timer)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +
> +static int __hrtick_restart(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + struct hrtimer *timer = &rq->hrtick_timer;
> + ktime_t time = hrtimer_get_softexpires(timer);
> +
> + return __hrtimer_start_range_ns(timer, time, 0, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED, 0);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * called from hardirq (IPI) context
> */
> @@ -412,7 +414,7 @@ static void __hrtick_start(void *arg)
> struct rq *rq = arg;
>
> raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> - hrtimer_restart(&rq->hrtick_timer);
> + __hrtick_restart(rq);
> rq->hrtick_csd_pending = 0;
> raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> }
> @@ -430,7 +432,7 @@ void hrtick_start(struct rq *rq, u64 delay)
> hrtimer_set_expires(timer, time);
>
> if (rq == this_rq()) {
> - hrtimer_restart(timer);
> + __hrtick_restart(rq);
> } else if (!rq->hrtick_csd_pending) {
> __smp_call_function_single(cpu_of(rq), &rq->hrtick_csd, 0);
> rq->hrtick_csd_pending = 1;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <521F6D06.1040107@keymile.com>
2013-08-29 20:56 ` kernel deadlock Falauto, Gerlando
2013-08-29 23:45 ` John Stultz
2013-08-30 23:04 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-08-30 23:10 ` John Stultz
2013-08-31 0:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-31 8:11 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-09-03 14:57 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-09-03 17:26 ` John Stultz
2013-09-04 8:11 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-09-09 20:29 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-10 16:23 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-10 8:59 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-10 16:38 ` John Stultz
2013-09-11 0:37 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-09 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-12 14:42 ` Gerlando Falauto [this message]
2003-07-30 20:00 Kernel deadlock Paul Douglas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5231D2CF.5080400@keymile.com \
--to=gerlando.falauto@keymile.com \
--cc=Holger.Brunck@keymile.com \
--cc=Stefan.Bigler@keymile.com \
--cc=Valentin.Longchamp@keymile.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.