From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Call for participants : teuthology weekly meeting Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:44:57 +0200 Message-ID: <5232FAB9.1090701@dachary.org> References: <52028301.70301@dachary.org> <520A2D0E.9060709@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5DA52AB4ABC6A0A23F9B7285" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:33819 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750842Ab3IMLo7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:44:59 -0400 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (openvpn.novalocal [10.145.3.13]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA2B26394 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:44:57 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <520A2D0E.9060709@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5DA52AB4ABC6A0A23F9B7285 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Zack Cerza who is the driving force behind teuthology kindly accepted to = hold the first teuthology meeting=20 thursday 19th september 2013, 6pm Paris/Berlin time / 9am Los Angel= es time.=20 Now that #ceph-devel is live we will use it as a back-channel. There is n= o formal agenda except : "I want my own teuthology!" ;-) It will be timeb= oxed to one hour max and the communication channel ( mumble, phone confer= ence ... ) will be announced on #ceph-devel half an hour before ( my nick= is loicd ). Cheers On 13/08/2013 14:56, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Ceph, >=20 > Teuthology was successfully installed & run as described here: >=20 > http://dachary.org/?p=3D2204 >=20 > with only two minor glitches: >=20 > "teuthology : ulimit: error" http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-sy= stems.ceph.devel/16421 > "do not check the jobid if check-locks is False" https://github.com/cep= h/teuthology/pull/27 >=20 > Cheers >=20 > On 07/08/2013 19:25, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Ceph, >> >> During the Emperor summit this week, running and installing teuthology= with a minimum effort was discussed ( see http://youtu.be/hrQuYzyXvVg?t=3D= 1h21m49s and http://pad.ceph.com/p/cds-teuthology ) I've installed it onc= e, back in January 2013 and that was not too difficult but required a few= hours and exchanging a few mails. More importantly, I soon discovered th= at the Inktank developers are modifying teuthology quite often and don't = really have the bandwidth to make sure any third party can install or upg= rade. It is still very much a tool internal to inktank. >> >> There are a number of Ceph developers who, like me, would like to be a= ble to run teuthology on their own machines. But none of us has the time = to make that happen on his / her own. However, if we get together, we may= be able to do it. The trick is to keep up with Inktank changes and we ma= y have found a way : meet online with the Inktank's teuthology developers= on a weekly basis to bridge the gap. That would not be forever : just un= til there are enough teuthology users and Inktank is just one of them. >> >> Of course that will require some work on our part ( non Inktank employ= ees ) but the overall benefit of running integration tests is worth it. A= t least it's enough incentive for me to dedicate at least 4 hours on a we= ekly basis.=20 >> >> This is an open discussion, nothing is set except the commitment of In= ktank to participate in these meetings and my own commitment of at least = 4 hours / week i.e. half a day doing just this. Including the meeting ;-= ) >> >> Who's willing to join this effort ? Do you think there is a better way= ? >> >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do noth= ing. --------------enig5DA52AB4ABC6A0A23F9B7285 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIy+rkACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20dIQCdFXyRB5olsDmG29zJ9g9+DhGH XloAn3YRlV1XkrKs7ZIiKrrStYatHhoX =fmjs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5DA52AB4ABC6A0A23F9B7285--