From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/12] block: add logical block provisioning information to BlockDriverInfo
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:58:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52330C08.8090607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52330386.8010709@kamp.de>
Il 13/09/2013 14:22, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
> Am 13.09.2013 13:45, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> Il 13/09/2013 12:44, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>> On 13.09.2013 12:34, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> Il 13/09/2013 12:25, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>>>> + /* maximum number of sectors that can be discarded at once */
>>>>> + int max_discard;
>>>>> + /* maximum number of sectors that can zeroized at once */
>>>>> + int max_write_zeroes;
>>>> These should not be needed outside the driver.
>>>>
>>>> If you want to make them private between block.c and block/iscsi.c, you
>>>> can add them to BlockDriverState.
>>> The question is, if the discard_zeroes or discard_write_zeroes is needed
>>> outside the driver as well?
>>>
>>> I can put the max_* information in the block driver state. I also thought
>>> to add alignment and granularity information even if they are currently
>>> not yet used.
>> Yeah, in fact bdrv_write_zeroes and bdrv_discard can be taught to split
>> requests according to these parameters instead of introducing a new
>> function bdrv_zeroize. You don't need bdrv_zeroize I think; you can
>> simply use bdrv_write_zeroes. This is why I don't like this information
>> in BlockDriverInfo.
>
> bdrv_zeroize has one big advantage over a bdrv_write_zeroes over
> the whole device: it checks the block status before it sends requests.
> this can be a great performance benefit if a lot of blocks are already
> unmapped. so i would like to keep it in, but simplifiy it (see below).
Good idea.
> For now I can factor out the request split logic out of
> iscsi_co_discard, iscsi_co_write_zeroes and bdrv_sanitize
> and put them in bdrv_co_discard and bdrv_co_write_zeroes.
>
> I would like to leave the misalignment logic to a later patch.
Sure.
> What would you think are reasonable default values for
> max_discard and max_write_zeroes?
32768 (16 MB) is the highest power-of-two amount that fits in 16 bits
assuming 512-byte sectors. But you could also take a look at what the
Linux kernel does in drivers/scsi/sd.c.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-13 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 10:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/12] block: logical block provisioning enhancements Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 10:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/12] block: make BdrvRequestFlags public Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 16:29 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 10:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/12] block: add flags to bdrv_*_write_zeroes Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 16:58 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/12] block: introduce BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP in bdrv_co_write_zeroes Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 18:07 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/12] iscsi: add .bdrv_co_write_zeroes Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 18:10 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/12] block: add logical block provisioning information to BlockDriverInfo Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 10:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-13 10:44 ` Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 11:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-13 12:22 ` Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 12:58 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-09-16 11:30 ` Peter Lieven
2013-09-16 11:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/12] iscsi: add .bdrv_get_info Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 18:19 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/12] block: introduce bdrv_zeroize Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 10:47 ` Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 18:23 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/12] qemu-img: conditionally zero out target on convert Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 10:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-13 10:46 ` Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 11:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-13 18:25 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 19:48 ` Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 19:52 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-16 11:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/12] block/get_block_status: set *pnum = 0 on error Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 18:26 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/12] block/get_block_status: avoid segfault if there is no backing_hd Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 18:26 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/12] block/get_block_status: avoid redundant callouts on raw devices Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 18:28 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-13 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/12] block/get_block_status: fix BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO for unallocated blocks Peter Lieven
2013-09-13 13:53 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-16 5:47 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52330C08.8090607@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.