On 9/16/13 1:26 PM, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:24:09AM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote: >> +static int btrfs_ioctl_set_features(struct file *file, void __user *arg) >> +{ >> + struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(file_inode(file))->root; >> + struct btrfs_super_block *super_block = root->fs_info->super_copy; >> + struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags flags[2]; >> + struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans; >> + u64 newflags; >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >> + return -EPERM; >> + >> + if (copy_from_user(flags, arg, sizeof(flags))) >> + return -EFAULT; >> + >> + /* Nothing to do */ >> + if (!flags[0].compat_flags && !flags[0].compat_ro_flags && >> + !flags[0].incompat_flags) >> + return 0; >> + >> + ret = check_feature(root, flags[0].compat_flags, >> + flags[1].compat_flags, COMPAT); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = check_feature(root, flags[0].compat_ro_flags, >> + flags[1].compat_ro_flags, COMPAT_RO); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = check_feature(root, flags[0].incompat_flags, >> + flags[1].incompat_flags, INCOMPAT); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1); > > It's ok to use 0 here, it's a superblock change and not related the the > metadata (similar to changing the label). > >> + if (IS_ERR(trans)) >> + return PTR_ERR(trans); >> + >> + spin_lock(&root->fs_info->super_lock); >> + newflags = btrfs_super_compat_flags(super_block); >> + newflags |= flags[0].compat_flags & flags[1].compat_flags; >> + newflags &= ~(flags[0].compat_flags & ~flags[1].compat_flags); >> + btrfs_set_super_compat_flags(super_block, newflags); >> + >> + newflags = btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(super_block); >> + newflags |= flags[0].compat_ro_flags & flags[1].compat_ro_flags; >> + newflags &= ~(flags[0].compat_ro_flags & ~flags[1].compat_ro_flags); >> + btrfs_set_super_compat_ro_flags(super_block, newflags); >> + >> + newflags = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(super_block); >> + newflags |= flags[0].incompat_flags & flags[1].incompat_flags; >> + newflags &= ~(flags[0].incompat_flags & ~flags[1].incompat_flags); >> + btrfs_set_super_incompat_flags(super_block, newflags); >> + spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->super_lock); >> + >> + return btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root); > > I think it's better to use btrfs_commit_transaction. The ioctl is about > to do a permanent change, any crash between ioctl and full commit will > revert to previous state of the features. This is not IMO desirable from > administrators POV. > > (Sidenote, IOC_SET_FSLABEL needs the same update.) Done, and I have a patch to fix the setlabel case as well. >> +} >> + >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h 2013-09-09 17:49:10.808003254 -0400 >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h 2013-09-09 17:49:12.483979430 -0400 >> @@ -184,6 +184,12 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args { >> __u64 reserved[124]; /* pad to 1k */ >> }; >> >> +struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags { >> + __u64 compat_flags; >> + __u64 compat_ro_flags; >> + __u64 incompat_flags; > > I wonder if it makes sense to add spare bytes here, but does not seem > necessary. We could double the size to allow for expansion, but I think it'd probably make more sense to add another ioctl later if we end up getting up to 64 features in a field. >> +}; >> @@ -579,4 +585,10 @@ static inline char *btrfs_err_str(enum b >> +#define BTRFS_IOC_GET_FEATURES _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 54, \ >> + struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags) >> +#define BTRFS_IOC_SET_FEATURES _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 54, \ >> + struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags[2]) >> +#define BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 54, \ >> + struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags[3]) > > The ioctl number 54 clashes with the OOB dedup merged into 3.12, 55 is > for the in-bound dedup and Anand has claimed 56. I've allocated 57 for > you and updated th wiki page: > > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#Development_notes.2C_please_read > > Stefan's trick to reuse the same number is really neat. Thanks, changed. -Jeff -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs