From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"s.neumann@raumfeld.com" <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>,
"afenkart@gmail.com" <afenkart@gmail.com>,
"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"johannes.berg@intel.com" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mwifiex: queue main work from main process when bailing on races
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 01:00:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52378D81.3070707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F70430F44C5849E@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
Hi Bing,
On 16.09.2013 23:14, Bing Zhao wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
>> index ff4ed96..0700bc2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
>> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ int mwifiex_main_process(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
>> /* Check if already processing */
>> if (adapter->mwifiex_processing) {
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->main_proc_lock, flags);
>> + queue_work(adapter->workqueue, &adapter->main_work);
>
> This is specific to SDIO interface,
Is it really? By checking adapter->mwifiex_processing, the driver seems
to expect mwifiex_main_process() to be called from multiple execution
paths, and in that case, we will always loose one execution cycle in
case we bail early. I actually wonder why this didn't hit us earlier,
but I might miss a detail.
OTOH, the worst thing that can happen if the function is executed too
often is that it exits early and does nothing.
> + if (adapter->iface_type == MWIFIEX_SDIO)
> + queue_work(adapter->workqueue, &adapter->main_work);
I can of course add this, but I don't fully understand why the driver
takes care of concurrently running executing paths and then just bails
silently in case a race is detected.
Best regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-16 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-16 11:39 [PATCH] mwifiex: fix command timeout with SDIO interrupts enabled Daniel Mack
2013-09-16 11:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] mwifiex: queue main work from main process when bailing on races Daniel Mack
2013-09-16 21:14 ` Bing Zhao
2013-09-16 23:00 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2013-09-17 18:19 ` Bing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52378D81.3070707@gmail.com \
--to=zonque@gmail.com \
--cc=afenkart@gmail.com \
--cc=bzhao@marvell.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=s.neumann@raumfeld.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.