Re: [PATCH] Powerpc/dts: Correct sdhci quirk for bsc9131

[Zhang Haijun <b42677@freescale.com>]

I see, thanks. ^_^

=E4=BA=8E 2013/9/17 3:42, Scott Wood =E5=86=99=E9=81=93:
> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 16:12 +0800, Zhang Haijun wrote:
>> On 09/02/2013 06:37 PM, Haijun Zhang wrote:
>>> We use property "sdhci,auto-cmd12" instead of "fsl,sdhci-auto-cmd12"
>>> to distinguish if the sdhc host has quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ=
_ACMD12.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang <Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi b/arch/pow=
erpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
>>> index 5180d9d..0c0efa9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
>>> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ usb@22000 {
>>>
>>>    /include/ "pq3-esdhc-0.dtsi"
>>>    	sdhc@2e000 {
>>> -		fsl,sdhci-auto-cmd12;
>>> +		sdhci,auto-cmd12;
>>>    		interrupts =3D <41 0x2 0 0>;
>>>    	};
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi, scott
>>
>> Could you help review this patch?
> I process patches in periodic batches.  There's no need for a reminder
> when it's only been two weeks, as long as it's still marked "new" or
> "under review" in patchwork (and you should include a patchwork link in
> any such reminder e-mail).  Especially for a trivial patch such as this=
,
> no comment often means I looked at it and saw no problems and will take
> it in the next batch.
>
> Though if you want a comment, don't capitalize "powerpc" in the
> subject. :-)
>
> -Scott
>
>

--=20
Thanks & Regards
Haijun.