All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modpost: Fix secondary errors seen if a single module build fails
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:17:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5238564D.6010307@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52384C72.4040403@suse.cz>

On 09/17/2013 05:34 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 15.9.2013 06:39, Guenter Roeck napsal(a):
>> Commit ea4054a23 (modpost: handle huge numbers of modules) added
>> support for building a large number of modules.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the commit changed the semantics of the makefile: Instead of
>> passing only existing object files to modpost, make now passes all expected
>> object files. If make was started with option -i, this results in a modpost
>> error if a single file failed to build.
>>
>> Example with the current btrfs build falure on m68k:
>>
>> fs/btrfs/btrfs.o: No such file or directory
>> make[1]: [__modpost] Error 1 (ignored)
>>
>> This error is followed by lots of errors such as:
>>
>> m68k-linux-gcc: error: arch/m68k/emu/nfcon.mod.c: No such file or directory
>> m68k-linux-gcc: fatal error: no input files
>> compilation terminated.
>> make[1]: [arch/m68k/emu/nfcon.mod.o] Error 1 (ignored)
>>
>> This doesn't matter much for normal builds, but it is annoying for builds
>> started with "make -i" due to the large number of secondary errors.
>> Those errors unnececessarily clog any error log and make it difficult
>> to find the real errors in the build.
>>
>> Fix the problem by only passing existing object files to modpost.
>>
>> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> ---
>>   scripts/Makefile.modpost |    3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.modpost b/scripts/Makefile.modpost
>> index 8dcdca2..387c806 100644
>> --- a/scripts/Makefile.modpost
>> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.modpost
>> @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ modpost = scripts/mod/modpost                    \
>>
>>   # We can go over command line length here, so be careful.
>>   quiet_cmd_modpost = MODPOST $(words $(filter-out vmlinux FORCE, $^)) modules
>> -      cmd_modpost = $(MODLISTCMD) | sed 's/\.ko$$/.o/' | $(modpost) -s -T -
>> +      cmd_modpost = $(MODLISTCMD) | sed 's/\.ko$$/.o/' | \
>> +	while read a; do [ -f $$a ] && echo $$a; done | $(modpost) -s -T -
>
> Can you do this filtering only if make -i is used ('i' is present in
> $(MAKEFLAGS)), to not hide potential buildsystem bugs? Regarding shell
> loop vs. ls, maybe the cleanest way would be to add an option to modpost
> to ignore missing files.
>

Possibly, but I don't really see the point, as the rest of the makefile
does and always did the same filtering already (using $(wildcard ...)
and it doesn't make sense to even try to run modpost on a file that
does not exist.

Sure, it might be a possibility to drop all the wildcard and other filtering
conditionally and only keep it if -i was specified, but I think that should
be a separate patch as it would add its own risks and complexities.

Guenter


  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-17 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-15  4:39 [PATCH] modpost: Fix secondary errors seen if a single module build fails Guenter Roeck
2013-09-15  8:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-15 15:06   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-16 18:33   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-17 12:34 ` Michal Marek
2013-09-17 13:17   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-09-18 14:05   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-25  9:15     ` Michal Marek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5238564D.6010307@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.