From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1VM844-0003ob-Ne for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:04:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VM83v-0003nX-RD for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:04:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VM83o-0002mB-I1 for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:04:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:40546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VM83o-0002lm-BV for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:04:12 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id xa7so6410724pbc.31 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:04:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=myDIfQqeslFS1vkta0A/A4Mjrp4BaZtfhDugXMcJCTs=; b=Kv20s1+TPrOFCH3xvrROYfue7FK0gcXv3gv4r5LNO5ChKUux+wtWZorBufovouqlg+ 5LH5B53Wn3B8ZE3/z9oCfTrAbs62eu01T/ge3hBvEjDDR3RQXlUHV1oOSWciioWAtAkj r33dLhzfpKVQnIeHIijAT64Vb2O/tn/QMEWXomdrkcZqYya0GPeIDShhoz9HOP0q8Rm8 rhd52SBn8+GaPV+z3yVrF+j+zqVlVF5GW+miqH00k1QFRav0u02AWdATgqKHNDodHS/P vhTkFQFHgmJ30FED+EwAX5CZl9Oplr9UfsnTp7LUtJVEsZZLSTyUr1udb/DMRV/BOiQm osSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlnnZ+b2xyzqeUFHWT3ekCBxZ/yr44q5PMenV670cA6p1mynnAXcDSXH3uC3khq40P8Pmfi X-Received: by 10.68.216.132 with SMTP id oq4mr11929934pbc.143.1379473450091; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aik.ozlabs.ibm.com (ibmaus65.lnk.telstra.net. [165.228.126.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm1263111paf.22.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52391821.1050004@ozlabs.ru> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:04:01 +1000 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolo Bonzini References: <1378196857-27541-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <5225AC9A.2090601@ozlabs.ru> <5225BD32.8030001@siemens.com> <52260025.3050704@ozlabs.ru> <522601AB.1050901@redhat.com> <5227F79B.8090804@ozlabs.ru> <52281F93.4070805@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <52281F93.4070805@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.160.44 Cc: Peter Maydell , kvm-devel , Gleb Natapov , QEMU Trivial , Jan Kiszka , Michael Tokarev , QEMU Developers , Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:04:27 -0000 On 09/05/2013 04:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>>>>> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken >>>>>> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? >>>>>> This is a mechanical change, no more. >>>> >>>> It's a matter of keeping things bisectable. If we can detect a >>>> breakage, we can first work around it, and then apply the header update. >>>> And if we don't detect it, maintainers usually send pull requests when >>>> they have time to work on breakage caused by their patches. >> >> I can see the discussion but I do not see if anyone is going to pull this >> through any tree. Please, somebody, pull. Thanks. > > It will go in through the KVM tree, probably sometime next week. It is pretty impressive how such a trivial patch is still on its way to the upstream :) -- Alexey From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:04:01 +1000 Message-ID: <52391821.1050004@ozlabs.ru> References: <1378196857-27541-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <5225AC9A.2090601@ozlabs.ru> <5225BD32.8030001@siemens.com> <52260025.3050704@ozlabs.ru> <522601AB.1050901@redhat.com> <5227F79B.8090804@ozlabs.ru> <52281F93.4070805@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Kiszka , Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , QEMU Trivial , Michael Tokarev , Gleb Natapov , kvm-devel , Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:64833 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751054Ab3IRDEK (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:04:10 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ld10so7666631pab.22 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:04:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52281F93.4070805@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/05/2013 04:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>>>>> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken >>>>>> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? >>>>>> This is a mechanical change, no more. >>>> >>>> It's a matter of keeping things bisectable. If we can detect a >>>> breakage, we can first work around it, and then apply the header update. >>>> And if we don't detect it, maintainers usually send pull requests when >>>> they have time to work on breakage caused by their patches. >> >> I can see the discussion but I do not see if anyone is going to pull this >> through any tree. Please, somebody, pull. Thanks. > > It will go in through the KVM tree, probably sometime next week. It is pretty impressive how such a trivial patch is still on its way to the upstream :) -- Alexey From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VM83x-0003ny-S0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:04:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VM83o-0002m6-Hw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:04:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:36249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VM83o-0002lk-BK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:04:12 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w10so6453087pde.37 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52391821.1050004@ozlabs.ru> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:04:01 +1000 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1378196857-27541-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <5225AC9A.2090601@ozlabs.ru> <5225BD32.8030001@siemens.com> <52260025.3050704@ozlabs.ru> <522601AB.1050901@redhat.com> <5227F79B.8090804@ozlabs.ru> <52281F93.4070805@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <52281F93.4070805@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Peter Maydell , kvm-devel , Gleb Natapov , QEMU Trivial , Jan Kiszka , Michael Tokarev , QEMU Developers On 09/05/2013 04:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>>>>> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken >>>>>> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? >>>>>> This is a mechanical change, no more. >>>> >>>> It's a matter of keeping things bisectable. If we can detect a >>>> breakage, we can first work around it, and then apply the header update. >>>> And if we don't detect it, maintainers usually send pull requests when >>>> they have time to work on breakage caused by their patches. >> >> I can see the discussion but I do not see if anyone is going to pull this >> through any tree. Please, somebody, pull. Thanks. > > It will go in through the KVM tree, probably sometime next week. It is pretty impressive how such a trivial patch is still on its way to the upstream :) -- Alexey