From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1VMCzL-0002Xq-2U for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:19:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMCzF-0002N3-4w for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:19:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMCzA-0004oZ-66 for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:19:49 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:58568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMCz0-0004lw-5A; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:19:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.88.2] (mjt.vpn.tls.msk.ru [192.168.177.99]) by isrv.corpit.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4FA41487; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:19:26 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <5239620E.90605@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:19:26 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130827 Icedove/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Liguori References: <1379188061-7634-1-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.62.121.231 Cc: qemu-trivial , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/15] trivial patches for 2013-09-14 X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:19:54 -0000 17.09.2013 19:06, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote= : >> Just a bit late but here's the next trivial-patches pull request. >> >> Thanks, > > Breaks the build: > > /home/anthony/git/qemu/cpu-exec.c: In function =E2=80=98cpu_alpha_exec=E2= =80=99: > /home/anthony/git/qemu/cpu-exec.c:204:15: error: variable =E2=80=98cpu=E2= =80=99 might > be clobbered by =E2=80=98longjmp=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98vfork=E2=80=99 [-= Werror=3Dclobbered] Which system do you use to compile stuff? I verified the series on a few versions of Debian and on a FreeBSD system, none shows any bad stuff. I'd like to test on a system similar to what you use to avoid breakage in the future. Speaking of this series, is it okay if I'll rebase with fixups and re-send the pull request? Thanks, /mjt From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMCz5-0002F4-9j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:19:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMCz0-0004nH-CQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:19:39 -0400 Message-ID: <5239620E.90605@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:19:26 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1379188061-7634-1-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/15] trivial patches for 2013-09-14 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-trivial , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel 17.09.2013 19:06, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote= : >> Just a bit late but here's the next trivial-patches pull request. >> >> Thanks, > > Breaks the build: > > /home/anthony/git/qemu/cpu-exec.c: In function =E2=80=98cpu_alpha_exec=E2= =80=99: > /home/anthony/git/qemu/cpu-exec.c:204:15: error: variable =E2=80=98cpu=E2= =80=99 might > be clobbered by =E2=80=98longjmp=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98vfork=E2=80=99 [-= Werror=3Dclobbered] Which system do you use to compile stuff? I verified the series on a few versions of Debian and on a FreeBSD system, none shows any bad stuff. I'd like to test on a system similar to what you use to avoid breakage in the future. Speaking of this series, is it okay if I'll rebase with fixups and re-send the pull request? Thanks, /mjt