From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: Xen 4.1.x security support Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:03:08 +0100 Message-ID: <52397A5C.1090000@citrix.com> References: <52377FC0.6000302@invisiblethingslab.com> <5238172E02000078000F3DBB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <52389387.10008@invisiblethingslab.com> <52389516.7020905@invisiblethingslab.com> <1379445486.11304.195.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <5238B3AA.3090805@invisiblethingslab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5238B3AA.3090805@invisiblethingslab.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Joanna Rutkowska Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Ian Campbell , Jan Beulich , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marek_Marczy?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?kowski-G=F3recki?= List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/17/2013 08:55 PM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: > What version does Xen Client use, BTW? We are currently on 4.3. > Really, who needs nested virtualization, or XSM -- these are of pure > academic interest and only make the hypervisor unnecessary bloated, IMO. Not sure what you're talking about here, since XenClient actually want (or already do) make use of both nested virtualization and XSM. -- Vincent