From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP5: id: Remove ES1.0 support Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:07:45 -0400 Message-ID: <5239B3B1.5000004@ti.com> References: <5239AE35.8030406@ti.com> <1379513142-11125-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1379513142-11125-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Tony Lindgren , Sricharan R , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 18 September 2013 10:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > OMAP5 ES1.0 was intended as a test chip and has major register level > differences w.r.t ES2.0 revision of the chip. All register defines, > dts support has been solely added for ES2.0 version of the chip. > Further, all ES1.0 chips and platforms are supposed to have been > removed from circulation. Hence, there is no need to further retain > any resemblence of ES1.0 support in id detection code. > > Remove the omap_revision handling and BUG() instead to prevent folks > who mistakenly try an older unsupported chip and report bogus errors. > > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon > --- > ref: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=137951198232339&w=2 > based on 3.12-rc1 tag > That was quick ... Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:07:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP5: id: Remove ES1.0 support In-Reply-To: <1379513142-11125-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> References: <5239AE35.8030406@ti.com> <1379513142-11125-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> Message-ID: <5239B3B1.5000004@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 18 September 2013 10:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > OMAP5 ES1.0 was intended as a test chip and has major register level > differences w.r.t ES2.0 revision of the chip. All register defines, > dts support has been solely added for ES2.0 version of the chip. > Further, all ES1.0 chips and platforms are supposed to have been > removed from circulation. Hence, there is no need to further retain > any resemblence of ES1.0 support in id detection code. > > Remove the omap_revision handling and BUG() instead to prevent folks > who mistakenly try an older unsupported chip and report bogus errors. > > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon > --- > ref: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=137951198232339&w=2 > based on 3.12-rc1 tag > That was quick ... Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar