From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -net] netpoll: fix NULL pointer dereference in netpoll_cleanup
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:09:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523A1677.2090602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379521524.1787.44.camel@joe-AO722>
On 09/18/2013 06:25 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 12:15 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:12:35 +0200
>>
>>> @@ -1284,15 +1284,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__netpoll_free_async);
>>>
>>> void netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
>>> {
>>> - if (!np->dev)
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> rtnl_lock();
>>> + if (!np->dev) {
>>> + rtnl_unlock();
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> __netpoll_cleanup(np);
>>> - rtnl_unlock();
>>> -
>>> dev_put(np->dev);
>>> np->dev = NULL;
>>> + rtnl_unlock();
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netpoll_cleanup);
>>
>> I know it seems arbitrary, but please do this like:
>>
>> lock();
>> if (condition) {
>> ...
>> }
>> unlock();
>>
>> rather than having multiple return/unlock code paths.
>>
>> This style I am suggesting is easier to audit for locking problems.
>
> Another alternative is:
>
> lock();
>
> if (!condition)
> goto out;
>
> ...
>
> out:
> unlock();
> return ...;
> }
>
Yup, this is the alternative I plan to use :-)
Thanks Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-18 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-17 14:12 [PATCH -net] netpoll: fix NULL pointer dereference in netpoll_cleanup Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-09-17 14:37 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-09-17 18:06 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-09-18 16:15 ` David Miller
2013-09-18 16:25 ` Joe Perches
2013-09-18 21:09 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2013-09-18 21:06 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523A1677.2090602@redhat.com \
--to=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.