Re: [PATCH 0/5] Preliminary: Add error names & descrptions to printks

[Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@att.net>]

On 09/18/2013 06:08 AM, David Howells wrote:
> danielfsantos@att.net wrote:
>
>> Typically, we don't care about error messages or names in the kernel because
>> userspace will manage that.  But sometimes we need to output an error number
>> to printks and that creates a situation where a user, system admistrator or
>> developer must find an error number reference to figure out what went wrong
>> with a particular driver or whatever.  This patch adds two alternatives at
>> increasing memory costs:
>>
>> 1. print the number in addition to the name for 2k extra or
>> 2. print the number, name and description for 6k extra.
> I like the idea generally - and have occasionally entertained the idea of
> implementing it myself.  However, I wouldn't bother with the "human readable"
> description if we're going to do this.  Generally, the symbolic representation
> is good enough - and that's what you're going to grep the code for anyway.
>
> David

Yeah, I thought about that too, but I figured that descriptions were 
already there so I may as well make it an option for the 
search-engine-impared. :)  I was also thinking about system 
administrators and ordinary users trying to installing device drivers 
and other such situations where they would have to look at their syslogs 
or dmesg -- or just the lazy. :)

Daniel