From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Call for participants : teuthology weekly meeting Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:31:37 +0200 Message-ID: <523B18D9.4050102@dachary.org> References: <52028301.70301@dachary.org> <520A2D0E.9060709@dachary.org> <5232FAB9.1090701@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig641F499BBEF429B6DB537A7D" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:39296 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751751Ab3ISPbo (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:31:44 -0400 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (openvpn.novalocal [10.145.3.13]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD5C226394 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:31:39 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <5232FAB9.1090701@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig641F499BBEF429B6DB537A7D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The meeting will use irc.oftc.net#ceph-devel and the mumble server at mum= ble.upstream-university.org . You don't need any authorization to connect= =2E If you pick the same nickname as IRC you will minimize the risk of a = name clash :-) Cheers On 13/09/2013 13:44, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Zack Cerza who is the driving force behind teuthology kindly accepted t= o hold the first teuthology meeting=20 >=20 > thursday 19th september 2013, 6pm Paris/Berlin time / 9am Los Ang= eles time.=20 >=20 > Now that #ceph-devel is live we will use it as a back-channel. There is= no formal agenda except : "I want my own teuthology!" ;-) It will be tim= eboxed to one hour max and the communication channel ( mumble, phone conf= erence ... ) will be announced on #ceph-devel half an hour before ( my ni= ck is loicd ). >=20 > Cheers >=20 > On 13/08/2013 14:56, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Ceph, >> >> Teuthology was successfully installed & run as described here: >> >> http://dachary.org/?p=3D2204 >> >> with only two minor glitches: >> >> "teuthology : ulimit: error" http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-s= ystems.ceph.devel/16421 >> "do not check the jobid if check-locks is False" https://github.com/ce= ph/teuthology/pull/27 >> >> Cheers >> >> On 07/08/2013 19:25, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> Hi Ceph, >>> >>> During the Emperor summit this week, running and installing teutholog= y with a minimum effort was discussed ( see http://youtu.be/hrQuYzyXvVg?t= =3D1h21m49s and http://pad.ceph.com/p/cds-teuthology ) I've installed it = once, back in January 2013 and that was not too difficult but required a = few hours and exchanging a few mails. More importantly, I soon discovered= that the Inktank developers are modifying teuthology quite often and don= 't really have the bandwidth to make sure any third party can install or = upgrade. It is still very much a tool internal to inktank. >>> >>> There are a number of Ceph developers who, like me, would like to be = able to run teuthology on their own machines. But none of us has the time= to make that happen on his / her own. However, if we get together, we ma= y be able to do it. The trick is to keep up with Inktank changes and we m= ay have found a way : meet online with the Inktank's teuthology developer= s on a weekly basis to bridge the gap. That would not be forever : just u= ntil there are enough teuthology users and Inktank is just one of them. >>> >>> Of course that will require some work on our part ( non Inktank emplo= yees ) but the overall benefit of running integration tests is worth it. = At least it's enough incentive for me to dedicate at least 4 hours on a w= eekly basis.=20 >>> >>> This is an open discussion, nothing is set except the commitment of I= nktank to participate in these meetings and my own commitment of at least= 4 hours / week i.e. half a day doing just this. Including the meeting ;= -) >>> >>> Who's willing to join this effort ? Do you think there is a better wa= y ? >>> >> >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do noth= ing. --------------enig641F499BBEF429B6DB537A7D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlI7GNkACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23xfwCggQfnm45Gsps+9tFKPQK4hDea bXsAn1KD6N3Hg395oDBnTpSiFljNi/5Q =aBsu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig641F499BBEF429B6DB537A7D--