All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] eventpoll: Move a kmem_cache_alloc and kmem_cache_free
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:37:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <523B2867.7000209@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5239FA69.8030202@akamai.com>

On 09/18/2013 02:09 PM, Jason Baron wrote:
> On 09/13/2013 11:54 AM, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
>> We noticed some scaling issue in the SPECjbb benchmark.  Running perf
>> we found that the it was spending lots of time in SYS_epoll_ctl.
>> In particular it is holding the epmutex.
>> This patch helps by moving out the kmem_cache_alloc and kmem_cache_free out
>> from under the lock.  It improves throughput by around 15% on 16 sockets.
>>
>> While this patch should be fine as it is there are probably is more things
>> that can be done out side the lock, like wakeup_source_unregister, but I am
>> not familar with the area and I don't know of many tests.  I did find the
>> one posted by Jason Baron at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
> Hi,
>
> Intersting - I think its also possible to completely drop taking the
> 'epmutex' for EPOLL_CTL_DEL by using rcu, and restricting it on add
> to more 'complex' topologies. That is when we have an epoll descriptor
> that doesn't nest with other epoll descriptors, we don't need the
> global 'epmutex' either. Any chance you can re-run with this? Its a bit
> hacky, but we can clean it up if it makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Jason
>
That is working GREAT.  It is scaling to 16 jobs quite well.
I will have to grab a larger machine( to see what the new scaling curve 
will be.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-19 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-13 15:54 [RFC] eventpoll: Move a kmem_cache_alloc and kmem_cache_free Nathan Zimmer
2013-09-18 19:09 ` Jason Baron
2013-09-19 16:37   ` Nathan Zimmer [this message]
2013-09-23 15:17     ` Jason Baron
2013-09-23 16:47       ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-09-24 19:30         ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-09-22 20:41   ` Eric Wong
2013-09-23 15:45     ` Jason Baron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=523B2867.7000209@sgi.com \
    --to=nzimmer@sgi.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.