From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753304Ab3IWCip (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 22:38:45 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46867 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753217Ab3IWCio (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 22:38:44 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Would an "information module" be useful? Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:38:30 +0200 Message-ID: <523FA9A6.40600@web.de> References: <523F4A55.3090106@web.de> <523F4C2A.3050207@nod.at> <523F5361.8040906@web.de> <523F551A.20101@nod.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: f048038158.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 In-Reply-To: <523F551A.20101@nod.at> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > In the systemd case we have to ensure that we never ever merge a module named "systemd". Interesting ... > We have all kinds of strange modules/drivers. Usually you don't have to think > whether your module is a "ordinary" driver or not... Would it become useful to move "drivers" which do not manage hardware to a separate directory? Should such source files belong to a different software category (or "class")? Regards, Markus