From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:49651 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752652Ab3IXOm0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:42:26 -0400 Message-ID: <5241A4AF.7030504@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:41:51 -0600 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: new fio release? References: <1416283628.111018.1380009575092.JavaMail.zimbra@teamix.de> In-Reply-To: <1416283628.111018.1380009575092.JavaMail.zimbra@teamix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: fio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: fio@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Steigerwald Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?R2VvcmcgU2Now7ZuYmVyZ2Vy?= On 09/24/2013 01:59 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi Jens! > > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while I did 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago. > > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think I was almost finished with it but I had: > > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio > > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already. > > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian packaging without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package from a fio release with these issues fixed. > > > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release? Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes between 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release. -- Jens Axboe