From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, eduardo.valentin@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Thermal: change spin lock
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:25:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5241CB22.2040709@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379023514-14982-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3249 bytes --]
Please change your patch subject. It suggests you are changing the
locking mechanism in the entire thermal subsystem, which is not true.
On 12-09-2013 18:05, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Change spin_lock to spin_lock_irqsave and spin_unlock to
> spin_unlock_irqrestore as the data it is trying to protect can also
> be modified in a notification call called from interrupt handler.
ditto for your patch description.
While you are there, looks like your lock needs a better documentation.
I would suggest you to add a description of what data it protects and
not leaving only documentation of where it it used.
Also, in your code it is not clear what is interrupt context and what is
not interrupt context. Now that you have found that you have the need to
use this lock in both context, please document it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> index f36950e..7722cb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> @@ -316,18 +316,19 @@ static void pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> int phy_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> struct phy_dev_entry *phdev = pkg_temp_thermal_get_phy_entry(cpu);
> bool notify = false;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> if (!phdev)
> return;
>
> - spin_lock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> ++pkg_work_cnt;
> if (unlikely(phy_id > max_phy_id)) {
> - spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> return;
> }
> pkg_work_scheduled[phy_id] = 0;
> - spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
>
> enable_pkg_thres_interrupt();
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS, msr_val);
> @@ -397,6 +398,7 @@ static int pkg_temp_thermal_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
> int thres_count;
> u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> u8 *temp;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> cpuid(6, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> thres_count = ebx & 0x07;
> @@ -420,19 +422,19 @@ static int pkg_temp_thermal_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
> goto err_ret_unlock;
> }
>
> - spin_lock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> if (topology_physical_package_id(cpu) > max_phy_id)
> max_phy_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> temp = krealloc(pkg_work_scheduled,
> (max_phy_id+1) * sizeof(u8), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!temp) {
> - spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_ret_free;
> }
> pkg_work_scheduled = temp;
> pkg_work_scheduled[topology_physical_package_id(cpu)] = 0;
> - spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
>
> phy_dev_entry->phys_proc_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> phy_dev_entry->first_cpu = cpu;
>
--
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
Eduardo Valentin
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-12 22:05 [PATCH] Thermal: change spin lock Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-09-24 16:32 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-09-24 17:14 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-24 18:34 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-09-24 17:25 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5241CB22.2040709@ti.com \
--to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.