All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	sbw@mit.edu,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/11] rcu: Micro-optimize rcu_cpu_has_callbacks()
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:55:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <524250A2.3050502@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380072561-31134-8-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


Thank you for your whole work, firstly  :-).


And your suggestion about testing (in our discussion) is also valuable
to me.

I need start LTP in q4. After referenced your suggestion, my first step
for using/learning LTP is not mainly for finding kernel issues, but for
testing kernel (to improve my kernel testing efficiency).

When I want to find issues by reading code, I will consider about LTP
too (I will try to find issues which can be tested by LTP).


On 09/25/2013 09:29 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> The for_each_rcu_flavor() loop unconditionally scans all flavors, even
> when the first flavor might have some non-lazy callbacks.  Once the
> loop has seen a non-lazy callback, further passes through the loop
> cannot change the state.  This is not a huge problem, given that there
> can be at most three RCU flavors (RCU-bh, RCU-preempt, and RCU-sched),
> but this code is on the path to idle, so speeding it up even a small
> amount would have some benefit.
> 
> This commit therefore does two things:
> 
> 1.	Rearranges the order of the list of RCU flavors in order to
> 	place the most active flavor first in the list.  The most active
> 	RCU flavor is RCU-preempt, or, if there is no RCU-preempt,
> 	RCU-sched.
> 
> 2.	Reworks the for_each_rcu_flavor() to exit early when the first
> 	non-lazy callback is seen, or, in the case where the caller
> 	does not care about non-lazy callbacks (RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=n),
> 	when the first callback is seen.
> 
> Reported-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/rcutree.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index e6f2e8f..49464ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -2727,10 +2727,13 @@ static int rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu, bool *all_lazy)
>  
>  	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
>  		rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
> -		if (rdp->qlen != rdp->qlen_lazy)
> +		if (!rdp->nxtlist)
> +			continue;
> +		hc = true;
> +		if (rdp->qlen != rdp->qlen_lazy || !all_lazy) {
>  			al = false;
> -		if (rdp->nxtlist)
> -			hc = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	if (all_lazy)
>  		*all_lazy = al;
> @@ -3297,8 +3300,8 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
>  
>  	rcu_bootup_announce();
>  	rcu_init_geometry();
> -	rcu_init_one(&rcu_sched_state, &rcu_sched_data);
>  	rcu_init_one(&rcu_bh_state, &rcu_bh_data);
> +	rcu_init_one(&rcu_sched_state, &rcu_sched_data);
>  	__rcu_init_preempt();
>  	open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks);
>  
> 


-- 
Chen Gang

-- 
Chen Gang

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-25  1:27 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/11] Fixes for 3.13 Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/11] mm: Place preemption point in do_mlockall() loop Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/11] rcu: Use proper cpp macro for ->gp_flags Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu: Convert local functions to static Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/11] rcu: Fix dubious "if" condition in __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue() Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/11] rcu: Make list_splice_init_rcu() account for RCU readers Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/11] rcu: Replace __get_cpu_var() uses Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/11] rcu: Silence unused-variable warnings Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/11] rcu: Micro-optimize rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  2:55     ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-09-25 20:16       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-26  2:57         ` Chen Gang
2013-09-26 18:33           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-27  2:29             ` Chen Gang
2013-09-29  4:24               ` Chen Gang
2013-09-29 20:23                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-30  1:33                   ` Chen Gang
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/11] rcu: Reject memory-order-induced stall-warning false positives Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/11] rcu: Have rcutiny tracepoints use tracepoint_string() Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  1:29   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu: Fix CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL panic on machines with sparse CPU mask Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25  4:10   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/11] mm: Place preemption point in do_mlockall() loop Andrew Morton
2013-09-25 13:48     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-25 19:35       ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-25 20:18         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=524250A2.3050502@asianux.com \
    --to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sbw@mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.