From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [next:master 1495/1772] drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:86:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp'
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:27:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5242907D.2060203@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524106f9.teHmhjmgqBH0qZNH%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
On 09/24/2013 05:28 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: 1fa8f71dfa6e28c89afad7ac71dcb19b8c8da8b7
> commit: 09a799d04eb17e19bbc80cb0e350a3ec89552b01 [1495/1772] staging:iio:dummy: Use iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp()
> config: i386-randconfig-j6-09240827 (attached as .config)
>
> All error/warnings:
>
> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c: In function 'iio_simple_dummy_trigger_h':
>>> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:86:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data, iio_get_time_ns());
> ^
> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c: At top level:
> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:108:16: error: 'iio_sw_buffer_preenable' undeclared here (not in a function)
> .preenable = &iio_sw_buffer_preenable,
> ^
> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c: In function 'iio_simple_dummy_configure_buffer':
> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:141:8: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> buffer->scan_timestamp = true;
> ^
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +/iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp +86 drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
>
> 80 /* random access read from the 'device' */
> 81 data[i] = fakedata[j];
> 82 len += 2;
> 83 }
> 84 }
> 85
> > 86 iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data, iio_get_time_ns());
> 87
> 88 kfree(data);
> 89
Hm, the config that generated this has:
CONFIG_IIO=m
# CONFIG_IIO_BUFFER is not set
CONFIG_IIO_KFIFO_BUF=m
How is it possible that IIO_KFIFO_BUF is selected but not IIO_BUFFER?
- Lars
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <524106f9.teHmhjmgqBH0qZNH%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2013-09-25 7:27 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2013-09-25 16:16 ` [next:master 1495/1772] drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:86:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp' Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-25 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-25 16:29 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-09-25 17:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5242907D.2060203@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.