From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Xenomai <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] libalchemy: failing test case task-5
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:29:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524290CC.8000705@xenomai.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5241DAB0.8000604@siemens.com>
On 09/24/2013 08:32 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I played a bit with the native skin emulation in Xenomai 3. The shipped
> test cases in lib/alchemy/testsuite point a problem:
> rt_task_set_priority is no longer a pure real-time services. As it calls
> libc's pthread_setschedparam internally, it will - at least briefly -
> switch the caller to secondary mode. This break the task-5 test which
> assumes a different behaviour.
>
> Are there ideas/plans to address this issues?
The switch to secondary mode will remain, the 2.6 implementation is even
worse actually. We have to keep both schedulers in sync, and for that,
the glibc has to be notified about the policy/priority change as well.
In 2.6, the target thread would receive a SIGSHADOW notification,
causing it to switch to secondary mode, while the setschedparam caller
would remain in primary mode. With 3.x, this is reversed: the thread
which issues the request does the switch, but the target thread whose
priority/policy was changed does not.
At the very least, this behavior is much saner, since the issuer has to
be aware of the consequences of its request, and the target thread won't
move to secondary in a random fashion with respect to its code flow. In
addition, this lifts a potential deadlock situation, as
pthread_setschedparm is not async-safe, so running it over a SHIGSHADOW
handler is not that safe.
Are there more case known
> where the new architecture provides some challenges when trying to
> preserve original API semantics?
>
All user-visible changes are tracked in an internal document here. I'll
publish it right after the Cobalt/POSIX extension model with Xenomai 3
is fully validated, since this might have a few implications more.
--
Philippe.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 18:32 [Xenomai] libalchemy: failing test case task-5 Jan Kiszka
2013-09-25 7:29 ` Philippe Gerum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524290CC.8000705@xenomai.org \
--to=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.