From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM DT cpus/cpu and topology bindings
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:50:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5242EA2E.1010106@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130924160126.GC403@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 09/24/2013 11:01 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> [replying to self]
>
> Any further comments on this series ? If not, I think bindings are ready to be
> queued, but for that I need acks from DT maintainers.
Who do you plan to take this? Is this dependent on something for 3.13?
If not, I'll apply it.
Rob
> The issue with in kernel dts that (re)-need patching owing to re-introduction
> of reg property on pre-v7 UP is still pending.
>
> Please advise, thank you very much,
> Lorenzo
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:21:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> This is v2 of a previous posting:
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-August/192322.html
>>
>> - v2 changes
>> - Removed single core cpu-map example
>> - Removed OS dependency from cpus/cpu bindings
>> - Updated Marvell compatible strings
>> - Clarified behaviour on pre ARM v7 uniprocessor systems and updated
>> examples
>>
>> This patch resumes DT topology/cpu bindings discussions for ARM that were
>> started here:
>>
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-April/031725.html
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-April/032450.html
>>
>> Comments welcome, thanks,
>> Lorenzo
>>
>> Lorenzo Pieralisi (2):
>> Documentation: devicetree: arm: cpus/cpu nodes bindings updates
>> Documentation: DT: arm: define CPU topology bindings
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 391 +++++++++++++++--
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt | 474 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 818 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.2.2
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Nicolas Pitre
<nicolas.pitre-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Vincent Guittot
<vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org"
<rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Gregory Clement
<gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM DT cpus/cpu and topology bindings
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:50:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5242EA2E.1010106@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130924160126.GC403-7AyDDHkRsp3ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
On 09/24/2013 11:01 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> [replying to self]
>
> Any further comments on this series ? If not, I think bindings are ready to be
> queued, but for that I need acks from DT maintainers.
Who do you plan to take this? Is this dependent on something for 3.13?
If not, I'll apply it.
Rob
> The issue with in kernel dts that (re)-need patching owing to re-introduction
> of reg property on pre-v7 UP is still pending.
>
> Please advise, thank you very much,
> Lorenzo
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:21:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> This is v2 of a previous posting:
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-August/192322.html
>>
>> - v2 changes
>> - Removed single core cpu-map example
>> - Removed OS dependency from cpus/cpu bindings
>> - Updated Marvell compatible strings
>> - Clarified behaviour on pre ARM v7 uniprocessor systems and updated
>> examples
>>
>> This patch resumes DT topology/cpu bindings discussions for ARM that were
>> started here:
>>
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-April/031725.html
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-April/032450.html
>>
>> Comments welcome, thanks,
>> Lorenzo
>>
>> Lorenzo Pieralisi (2):
>> Documentation: devicetree: arm: cpus/cpu nodes bindings updates
>> Documentation: DT: arm: define CPU topology bindings
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 391 +++++++++++++++--
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt | 474 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 818 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.2.2
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-16 11:21 [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM DT cpus/cpu and topology bindings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-16 11:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-16 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: devicetree: arm: cpus/cpu nodes bindings updates Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-16 11:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-16 13:32 ` Jason Cooper
2013-09-16 13:32 ` Jason Cooper
2013-09-16 19:28 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-09-16 19:28 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-09-25 16:12 ` Mark Rutland
2013-09-25 16:12 ` Mark Rutland
2013-09-16 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: DT: arm: define CPU topology bindings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-16 11:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-24 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM DT cpus/cpu and " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-24 16:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-25 13:50 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-09-25 13:50 ` Rob Herring
2013-09-26 10:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-26 10:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-26 21:42 ` Rob Herring
2013-09-26 21:42 ` Rob Herring
2013-09-27 14:51 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-27 14:51 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5242EA2E.1010106@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.