All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, patches@linaro.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] xen/arm: gic: Use the correct CPU ID
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:42:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52430448.2000904@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380123356.4910.31.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>

On 09/25/2013 04:35 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 16:03 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> +static unsigned int gic_cpu_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int cpu;
>> +    unsigned int mask = 0;
>> +    cpumask_t possible_mask;
>> +
>> +    cpumask_and(&possible_mask, cpumask, &cpu_possible_map);
>> +    for_each_cpu(cpu, &possible_mask)
>> +    {
>> +        ASSERT(cpu < NR_GIC_CPU_IF);
>> +        ASSERT(__per_cpu_offset[cpu] != -(long)__per_cpu_start);
> 
> This should be INVALID_PERCPU_AREA, but that is private to percpu.c. I
> think we can live without this check. After all the CPU is in possible
> map.

Being in cpu possible map doesn't mean that the per cpu region is
initialized for the given cpu.
I have noticed the INVALID_PERCPU_AREA is the same both Intel and ARM
platform. Can we move this define in percpu.h?

-- 
Julien Grall

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-18 13:15 [PATCH v3 0/6] Dissociate logical and gic/hardware CPU ID Julien Grall
2013-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] xen/arm: use cpumask_t to describe cpu mask in gic_route_dt_irq Julien Grall
2013-09-25 15:36   ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] xen/arm: Initialize correctly IRQ routing Julien Grall
2013-09-25 15:37   ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] xen/arm: gic: Use the correct CPU ID Julien Grall
2013-09-20 12:44   ` Julien Grall
2013-09-20 13:36     ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-20 13:49       ` Julien Grall
2013-09-20 15:03   ` Julien Grall
2013-09-20 15:44     ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-20 15:58       ` Julien Grall
2013-09-20 16:06         ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-20 18:48           ` Julien Grall
2013-09-25 15:35     ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-25 15:42       ` Julien Grall [this message]
2013-09-25 15:48         ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-25 15:53           ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-25 16:34             ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] xen/arm: Fix assert in send_SGI_one Julien Grall
2013-09-25 15:37   ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] xen/arm: Dissociate logical and hardware CPU ID Julien Grall
2013-09-25 15:38   ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] xen/arm: Use the hardware ID to boot correctly secondary cpus Julien Grall
2013-09-25 15:41   ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-26 10:18     ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52430448.2000904@linaro.org \
    --to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.