From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>
Subject: Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't
 match
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 22:46:04 +0200
Message-ID: <52434B8C.1080307@arcor.de>
References: <523CADFD.9050006@arcor.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <523CADFD.9050006@arcor.de>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

I just submitted the new unit test tests/10ddf-incremental-wrong-order
that illustrates tricky scenario described in this RFC, B.2.e).

Martin