From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Waldek Subject: Odp: Re: patch INP3 for kernel 3.6 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:20:40 +0200 Message-ID: <5243ee588b32f4.42875689@wp.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wp.pl; s=1024a; t=1380183640; bh=vj/HqdQlruS9PqqLNA35XMafB3J1SnAl2FCqBesuOt4=; h=From:To:Subject; b=ccw/Hiuecvzyylr+zh9gf1P4k8uUfpBaDrIUXvFD9137PZWM5ohOW2gCujcxPhpJL v8/Qkf6FGR6r8p2IlnAm6c4q0rbTJDuD+7va05Dlb37Jtqs3ZCxY5WYJr2qeD9v5bF maKy8lqbwNth4rkXdUp08EyrcZ3wF/0PagtwYSuM= Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: linux-hams Ok I have try compile kernel 3.6 with fixed rejected netrom.h and patch= don't working with 3.6 kernel CC [M] net/netrom/af_netrom.o In file included from net/netrom/af_netrom.c:40:0: include/net/netrom.h:72:27: warning: declaration does not declare anyth= ing [enabled by default] net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_ioctl': net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1261:3: error: implicit declaration of function = 'inp3_set_mnem' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1269:3: error: implicit declaration of function = 'inp3_get_mnem' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_proto_init': net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1481:2: error: implicit declaration of function = 'kinp3d_start' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_exit': net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1512:2: error: implicit declaration of function = 'kinp3d_stop' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [net/netrom/af_netrom.o] error 1 make[1]: *** [net/netrom] error 2 make: *** [net] error 2 Dnia Czwartek, 26 Wrze=B6nia 2013 10:10 Matt Maguire napisa=B3(a)=20 > I'm not surprised it doesn't apply cleanly -- it is for 2.6 kernel, > not 3.6. Even if it did apply, I wouldn't use it until the deadlock > issue is addressed -- that's why I was interested to hear that someon= e > else made a patch for 2.6, as I am curious whether they also fixed th= e > deadlock issue inherited from the 2.4 patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html