From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen Gang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: let check zero instead of check NO_IRQ Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:40:00 +0800 Message-ID: <52440F00.702@asianux.com> References: <523FB47C.8010800@asianux.com> <523FB6F4.60803@asianux.com> <523FB735.2060906@asianux.com> <20130926102914.GG19304@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130926102914.GG19304@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" To: Mark Brown Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 09/26/2013 06:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:36:21AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> NO_IRQ may be defined as '(unsigned int) -1' in some architectures >> (arm, sh ...), and either may not be defined in some architectures >> which can enable SND_SOC_FSL_SSI (e.g. allmodconfig for arc). > > Applied, thanks. > Thank you too. :-) -- Chen Gang