From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Fix scalability problem on callchain merging (v4)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 07:46:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52443ABC.8020808@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380185890-25758-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
On 9/26/13 2:58 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a new version of callchain improvement patchset. I found and
> fixed bugs in the previous version. I verified that it produced
> exactly same output before and after applying rbtree conversion patch
> (#1). However after Frederic's new comm infrastructure patches are
> applied it'd be little different.
>
> The patches are on 'perf/callchain-v4' branch in my tree
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
>
Given recent breakage, has the patchset been run through any tests on
older kernels that do not support sample_id_all? e.g., 2.6.34 (WRL4).
What about tests with the other perf commands -- script to dump events,
trace on a file with with multiple processes -- to verify no impact on
comm output, especially multithreaded processes with named threads. I
can certainly do those tests in time, but can't guarantee a timeframe
and want to make sure it gets done before merging.
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 8:58 [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Fix scalability problem on callchain merging (v4) Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf callchain: Convert children list to rbtree Namhyung Kim
2013-10-02 10:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-08 2:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-08 19:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-10 1:06 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf ui/progress: Add new helper functions for progress bar Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf tools: Show progress on histogram collapsing Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf tools: Use an accessor to read thread comm Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf tools: Add time argument on comm setting Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Add new comm infrastructure Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf tools: Compare hists comm by addresses Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Get current comm instead of last one Namhyung Kim
2013-10-02 10:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-08 1:56 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 9:34 ` [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Fix scalability problem on callchain merging (v4) Ingo Molnar
2013-09-27 2:08 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 13:46 ` David Ahern [this message]
2013-09-26 14:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-27 2:10 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52443ABC.8020808@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.