From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Afzal Mohammed Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] ARM: OMAP2+: CM: AM43x clockdomain data Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:35:39 +0530 Message-ID: <52495B03.3050006@ti.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:48501 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753590Ab3I3LGH (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:06:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley , Ambresh K Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Benoit Cousson , Tony Lindgren , Rajendra Nayak Hi Paul, On Monday 30 September 2013 03:01 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Afzal Mohammed wrote: >> From: Ambresh K >> >> Add the data file to describe clock domains in AM43x SoC. >> OMAP4 clockdomain operations is being reused here. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ambresh K >> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.h | 2 + >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cminst44xx.c | 9 ++ >> 3 files changed, 207 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c >> > > ... > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..6d71c60 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ > > ... > >> +static struct clockdomain l3s_tsc_43xx_clkdm = { >> + .name = "l3s_tsc_clkdm", >> + .pwrdm = { .name = "wkup_pwrdm" }, >> + .prcm_partition = AM43XX_CM_PARTITION, >> + .cm_inst = AM43XX_CM_WKUP_INST, >> + .clkdm_offs = AM43XX_CM_WKUP_L3S_TSC_CDOFFS, >> + .flags = CLKDM_CAN_SWSUP, >> +}; > The references to "wkup_pwrdm" on some of these clockdomains don't > look right to me. For example, this clockdomain is listed as being in > AM43XX_CM_WKUP_INST, but its enclosing powerdomain is listed as being in > AM43XX_PRM_WKUP_INST. Looks to me like it's best to have two different > wakeup powerdomains: one CM_WKUP, and one PRM_WKUP. On AM43x, prcm is a single block as in AM335x and is part of wakeup domain. This is different from OMAP4 that had separate prm and cm blocks. Script also generated the same output. Regards Afzal From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: afzal@ti.com (Afzal Mohammed) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:35:39 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v4 07/11] ARM: OMAP2+: CM: AM43x clockdomain data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52495B03.3050006@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Paul, On Monday 30 September 2013 03:01 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Afzal Mohammed wrote: >> From: Ambresh K >> >> Add the data file to describe clock domains in AM43x SoC. >> OMAP4 clockdomain operations is being reused here. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ambresh K >> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.h | 2 + >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cminst44xx.c | 9 ++ >> 3 files changed, 207 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c >> > > ... > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..6d71c60 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains43xx_data.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ > > ... > >> +static struct clockdomain l3s_tsc_43xx_clkdm = { >> + .name = "l3s_tsc_clkdm", >> + .pwrdm = { .name = "wkup_pwrdm" }, >> + .prcm_partition = AM43XX_CM_PARTITION, >> + .cm_inst = AM43XX_CM_WKUP_INST, >> + .clkdm_offs = AM43XX_CM_WKUP_L3S_TSC_CDOFFS, >> + .flags = CLKDM_CAN_SWSUP, >> +}; > The references to "wkup_pwrdm" on some of these clockdomains don't > look right to me. For example, this clockdomain is listed as being in > AM43XX_CM_WKUP_INST, but its enclosing powerdomain is listed as being in > AM43XX_PRM_WKUP_INST. Looks to me like it's best to have two different > wakeup powerdomains: one CM_WKUP, and one PRM_WKUP. On AM43x, prcm is a single block as in AM335x and is part of wakeup domain. This is different from OMAP4 that had separate prm and cm blocks. Script also generated the same output. Regards Afzal