From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kernel/sysfs: cleanup set up macros for pmc/non pmc sprs
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 12:14:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524A6F59.9060004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131001045035.GC17966@concordia>
On Tuesday 01 October 2013 10:20 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 04:47:29PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> Currently pmc setup macros are used for non pmc sprs. This patch
>> add new set of macros and cleans up the code to use the new setup macro
>> for non pmc sprs.
>
> Hi Maddy,
>
> Firstly you should use "PMC" not pmc, it's an acronym. You should also
> spell out what it means the first time you use it, eg:
>
> Currently the PMC (Performance Monitor Counter) macros are used ..
>
> Secondly you need to say _why_ it is a bad idea to use the PMC macros
> for non-PMC SPRs.
>
Will change it.
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
>> index 27a90b9..73b6f9f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
>> @@ -139,6 +139,37 @@ static ssize_t __used \
>> return count; \
>> }
>>
>> +#define SYSFS_SPRSETUP(NAME, ADDRESS) \
>> +static void read_##NAME(void *val) \
>> +{ \
>> + *(unsigned long *)val = mfspr(ADDRESS); \
>> +} \
>> +static void write_##NAME(void *val) \
>> +{ \
>> + mtspr(ADDRESS, *(unsigned long *)val); \
>> +} \
>> +static ssize_t show_##NAME(struct device *dev, \
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> + char *buf) \
>> +{ \
>> + struct cpu *cpu = container_of(dev, struct cpu, dev); \
>> + unsigned long val; \
>> + smp_call_function_single(cpu->dev.id, read_##NAME, &val, 1); \
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%lx\n", val); \
>> +} \
>> +static ssize_t __used \
>> + store_##NAME(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> + const char *buf, size_t count) \
>> +{ \
>> + struct cpu *cpu = container_of(dev, struct cpu, dev); \
>> + unsigned long val; \
>> + int ret = sscanf(buf, "%lx", &val); \
>> + if (ret != 1) \
>> + return -EINVAL; \
>> + smp_call_function_single(cpu->dev.id, write_##NAME, &val, 1); \
>> + return count; \
>> +}
>
> This is basically a complete copy of the SYSFS_PMCSETUP() macro, except
> for the one line removal of the call to ppc_enable_pmcs().
>
> You should be able to do better, by defining a macro that does all the
> boiler plate and takes an "extra" argument, which for PMCs is
> "ppc_enable_pmcs()" and for regular SPRs is empty.
>
Sorry about that. Will make the changes.
> cheers
>
Thanks for the feedback
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-01 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-30 11:17 [PATCH] powerpc/kernel/sysfs: cleanup set up macros for pmc/non pmc sprs Madhavan Srinivasan
2013-10-01 4:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-10-01 6:44 ` Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524A6F59.9060004@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.