From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] ip_tunnel: Remove double unregister of the fallback device Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:30:51 +0200 Message-ID: <524AB26B.1070700@6wind.com> References: <20131001093359.GG7660@secunet.com> <20131001093737.GJ7660@secunet.com> <524A9D4C.9030900@6wind.com> <20131001104046.GK7660@secunet.com> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , Pravin Shelar , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Steffen Klassert Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:58038 "EHLO mail-wg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751173Ab3JALa6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:30:58 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id m15so6969802wgh.21 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 04:30:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20131001104046.GK7660@secunet.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 01/10/2013 12:40, Steffen Klassert a =E9crit : > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: >> >> Note that there is the same problem in >> net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c:ip6_tnl_destroy_tunnels() introduced by >> 0bd8762824e7 >> ("ip6tnl: add x-netns support"). >> >> Should I send a patch for it or would you take care of it? > > I don't mind either way. But you noticed the problem, so > feel free to send a patch yourself. > Ok, I will dot it. Thank you