From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] omniorb: cleanup autobuild failure, CFLAGS issue
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 18:30:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524AF88C.4070906@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380311674-6883-1-git-send-email-mlweber1@rockwellcollins.com>
On 09/27/13 21:54, Matt Weber wrote:
> Fixed:
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a08baf8821e3ee1fb9c36c8f74c4ced466af167b/
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/f0c7379c1f405385d3a64c0349c3d9565065e8a7/
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/c3de25ca52fdb8ffda7472cf9f7b64514954cbb1/
>
> Change Log:
> The target CFLAGS were getting mixed in during a manual build of some
> omniorb pkg tools that could be viewed as host tools.
> This manual build was a dirty workaround and created some bad
> cornercases. So I converted the package over to actually using the
> host pkg build and removed the need for a patch and custom mods in the build.
>
> Also there wasn't a dependency on the target having python, just
> host-python for performing the initial build. So depends were adjusted
> accordingly. If python bindings are required, they can be found in a different
> package called omniORBpy. The omniORB package only uses python for
> the build process.
>
> Fixed a bug with long double support. Currently leaving it disabled
> as most targets won't use it. This allows greater toolchain compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Weber <mlweber1@rockwellcollins.com>
Looks good. However:
[snip]
> +# Defaulting long double support to a safe option for the
> +# mix of embedded targets, this could later be automated
> +# based on checking the capability of the cross toolchain
> +# for "__LONG_DOUBLE_128__". Currently the host and target
> +# need to match because of the code generation done by the
> +# host tools during the target compile (ie headers generated
> +# on host are used in target build).
Ouch, this smells like there could also be an issue when the host and
the target have different data representations (e.g. endianness or
bitwidth). Do you think there is a risk of this?
> +OMNIORB_CONF_OPT += --disable-longdouble
>
> -# omniORB is currently not cross-compile friendly and has some assumptions
> -# where a couple host tools are built in place and then used during the
> -# build. The tools generate code from the IDL description language, which
> -# is then built into the cross compiled OMNIORB application.
> -# So this first hook builds the tools required for the host side
> -# generation of code. Then the second hook cleans up before the install.
> +# omniORB is not completely cross-compile friendly and has some
> +# assumptions where a couple host tools must be built and then
> +# used by the target build. The host tools generate code from
> +# the IDL description language, which is then built into the
> +# cross compiled target OMNIORB application.
> define OMNIORB_BUILD_TOOLS
Minor nit: you probably want to rename this variable as well.
> - $(HOST_MAKE_ENV) $(MAKE) $(HOST_CONFIGURE_OPTS) \
> - -C $(@D)/src/tool export
> + # Point to the host folder to get HOST_OMNIORB tools
> + $(SED) 's:TOOLBINDIR = $$(TOP)/$$(BINDIR):TOOLBINDIR = $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin:g' $(@D)/mk/beforeauto.mk
> + # Disables OMNIORB tool building
> + echo "EmbeddedSystem=1" >> $(@D)/mk/beforeauto.mk
> endef
> OMNIORB_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += OMNIORB_BUILD_TOOLS
>
> -define OMNIORB_CLEAN_TOOLS
> - $(HOST_MAKE_ENV) $(MAKE) $(HOST_CONFIGURE_OPTS) \
> - -C $(@D)/src/tool clean
> -endef
> -OMNIORB_POST_BUILD_HOOKS += OMNIORB_CLEAN_TOOLS
> -
> -define OMNIORB_FIXUP_FILE_PATHS_HOOK
> - $(SED) "s:$(HOST_DIR)/usr:/usr:g" $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/bin/omniidl
> -endef
> -OMNIORB_POST_INSTALL_STAGING_HOOKS += OMNIORB_FIXUP_FILE_PATHS_HOOK
> +HOST_OMNIORB_DEPENDENCIES = host-python
We usually put the host DEPENDENCIES just below the target stuff. So:
###########
# header
###########
<target variable definitions>
<host variable definitions>
<conditional target variables>
<conditional host variables>
<target cmds and hooks>
<host cmds and hooks>
$(eval $(...))
$(eval $(host-...))
Regards,
Arnout
>
> $(eval $(autotools-package))
> +$(eval $(host-autotools-package))
>
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-01 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 19:54 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] omniorb: cleanup autobuild failure, CFLAGS issue Matt Weber
2013-10-01 16:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-10-01 19:33 ` Matthew Weber
2013-10-01 20:41 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-10-01 21:30 ` Matthew Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524AF88C.4070906@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.