From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (www.dynamicdevices.co.uk [89.200.136.37]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD650E01684 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (cpc16-live22-2-0-cust180.know.cable.virginmedia.com [82.42.220.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7341986096 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <524C1BDA.8000507@dynamicdevices.co.uk> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:12:58 +0100 From: Alex J Lennon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Issues using meta-freescale i.MX6 vs LTIB ? X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:13:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I'm trying to qualify a decision to use Yocto / meta-freescale for an upcoming i.MX6 board variant (based on the Sabre reference) instead of using the officially supported release based on LTIB. My preference is strongly for the Yocto/OpenEmbedded build environment, for various reasons, but I understand that the Freescale i.MX6 BSP is not officially supported at this time. Knowing the experience and activity levels of the people working via these lists, I suspect that meta-freescale is by now significantly ahead of the current release of LTIB. That said I wonder if there are any known issues with using meta-freescale which might give me pause, and cause me to use LTIB at this time? Thanks for your advice, Alex Lennon Director Dynamic Devices Ltd