All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] tick: Make sleep length calculation more accurate
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:28:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <524C1F75.307@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380709565-22153-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

On 10/02/2013 12:26 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The sleep_length is computed in the tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick function but it
> is used later in the code with in between the local irq enabled.
>
> cpu_idle_loop
>    tick_nohz_idle_enter         [ exits with local irq enabled ]
>     __tick_nohz_idle_enter
>       tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick
>    ...
>
>    arch_cpu_idle
>       menu_select               [ uses here 'sleep_length' ]
>    ...
>
> Between the computation of the sleep length and its usage, some interrupts
> may occur, making the sleep length shorter than actually it is because of the
> interrupt processing, or different if the timer itself expired.
>
> This patch fixes that by moving the sleep_length computation in the
> tick_nohz_get_sleep_length function and using the tick device's next_event.
>
> As the sleep_length field is no longer needed, it is removed from the
> tick_sched structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>

Stephen,

I added your signed-off as the change in tick_nohz_get_sleep_length is 
the one you proposed previously.

   -- Daniel

> ---
>   include/linux/tick.h     |    2 --
>   kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    5 +++--
>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index 5128d33..53dbbd7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ enum tick_nohz_mode {
>    * @idle_exittime:	Time when the idle state was left
>    * @idle_sleeptime:	Sum of the time slept in idle with sched tick stopped
>    * @iowait_sleeptime:	Sum of the time slept in idle with sched tick stopped, with IO outstanding
> - * @sleep_length:	Duration of the current idle sleep
>    * @do_timer_lst:	CPU was the last one doing do_timer before going idle
>    */
>   struct tick_sched {
> @@ -67,7 +66,6 @@ struct tick_sched {
>   	ktime_t				idle_exittime;
>   	ktime_t				idle_sleeptime;
>   	ktime_t				iowait_sleeptime;
> -	ktime_t				sleep_length;
>   	unsigned long			last_jiffies;
>   	unsigned long			next_jiffies;
>   	ktime_t				idle_expires;
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 3612fc7..60b1dcd 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -673,7 +673,6 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts,
>   out:
>   	ts->next_jiffies = next_jiffies;
>   	ts->last_jiffies = last_jiffies;
> -	ts->sleep_length = ktime_sub(dev->next_event, now);
>
>   	return ret;
>   }
> @@ -837,8 +836,10 @@ void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void)
>   ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void)
>   {
>   	struct tick_sched *ts = &__get_cpu_var(tick_cpu_sched);
> +	struct clock_event_device *dev = __get_cpu_var(tick_cpu_device).evtdev;
> +	ktime_t now = ktime_get();
>
> -	return ts->sleep_length;
> +	return ktime_sub(dev->next_event, now);
>   }
>
>   static void tick_nohz_restart(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-02 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-02 10:26 [PATCH V2] tick: Make sleep length calculation more accurate Daniel Lezcano
2013-10-02 13:28 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2013-10-02 15:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-02 16:22   ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-10-02 16:42     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-02 18:03       ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-10-05  9:53         ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=524C1F75.307@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.