From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.206]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E6AE01684 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail49-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.228) by AM1EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.3.204.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:42:05 +0000 Received: from mail49-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail49-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4214A0268; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:42:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: 1 X-BigFish: VS1(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1432I1451L444fM1521Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1de097h186068h8275dhz2dh2a8h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1f5fh1fe8h1ff5h209eh133w1155h) Received: from mail49-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail49-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1380721323639654_32458; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AM1EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.251]) by mail49-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9750A2C008D; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by AM1EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (10.3.207.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:42:00 +0000 Received: from tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (10.81.153.31) by 039-SN1MMR1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.2; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:41:59 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.63] ([10.29.244.63]) by tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r92Dfvo4011082; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:41:58 -0700 Message-ID: <524C218D.7020101@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:37:17 -0300 From: Daiane Angolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex J Lennon , References: <524C1BDA.8000507@dynamicdevices.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <524C1BDA.8000507@dynamicdevices.co.uk> X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: Issues using meta-freescale i.MX6 vs LTIB ? X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:42:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/02/2013 10:12 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to qualify a decision to use Yocto / meta-freescale for an > upcoming > i.MX6 board variant (based on the Sabre reference) instead of using the > officially supported release based on LTIB. > > My preference is strongly for the Yocto/OpenEmbedded build environment, > for various reasons, but I understand that the Freescale i.MX6 BSP is not > officially supported at this time. > > Knowing the experience and activity levels of the people working via these > lists, I suspect that meta-freescale is by now significantly ahead of > the current > release of LTIB. > > That said I wonder if there are any known issues with using meta-freescale > which might give me pause, and cause me to use LTIB at this time? You can see all current known issues here https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=meta-fsl-arm&list_id=105732 As you may know, the last LTIB release from Freescale was 3.0.35_4.1.0. And, as already said in ML, next release 3.10.9_1.0.0 will be Yocto ;-) > > Thanks for your advice, > > Alex Lennon > Director > Dynamic Devices Ltd > > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale > -- Daiane