From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com [209.85.220.45]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35388E01638 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id rd3so1289088pab.18 for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:56:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CiXO0eLVh/NKjw7FgPtSWiu/MYNPpZ49Bx6ZY8S8oEE=; b=DNWWygjiI0K+aKhWxRg12HBTs7+ogqFrsozUC+7XCImmgqC/EARuW8469w/dZbWyGK p/6rDeWXNc45JPTnKRk4T1vGrCOjaL4rvvEtmwXTYIS4TLxZRSD8Hj59vLap/yIJOEOX MwA9I9x+/0ACArFaqnnttogRAoCCiacX2yyVPGSwXlwsrhGTjqgnhlY1QuuIoJo2RcqG BiiK/1umJD+5oO6sNXTtsZpJy/V6+VfWUvn+gO+kbTOr3fTWcQGzCWMdhdX7Oh5MLujN wNq0FBFmvIZf8ysBZ7RBevbRxPQIzX4idtf66I06MjZQJLtsvdcBO/BK2DqxzRy0is+S LKlg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkW6gMaLgIiNScETFwyCt1DAAE/JAg0VFdZ1557Kk9UO1Y5mOiDGmTCa58iR6VYYCszwM9H X-Received: by 10.66.226.46 with SMTP id rp14mr4273544pac.133.1380732986320; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.15] ([70.96.116.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dk3sm2968827pbc.32.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <524C5036.5060303@boundarydevices.com> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:56:22 -0700 From: Eric Nelson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <2BC32295742BF14CA5950C3659567EB677A2ED@039-SN1MPN1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net> <1412123.FJqSlycNOL@localhost.localdomain> <524C2625.2000109@freescale.com> <524C330B.4020404@boundarydevices.com> <524C49BD.3090602@boundarydevices.com> In-Reply-To: <524C49BD.3090602@boundarydevices.com> Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Diego , Post Lauren-RAA013 Subject: Re: Request to integrate freescale i.mx 3.10.9-1.0.0 alpha release into dora branch of meta-fsl-arm X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 16:56:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/02/2013 09:28 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Thanks Otavio, > On 10/02/2013 08:11 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Eric Nelson >>> What's more, I think it's very important for different boards to be >>> able to specify which kernel version is recommended for each, since >>> the efforts behind them progress along different time-lines. >> >> Yes; this can be done. We does it already and Bondary's boards also >> use a different kernel. >> > > Kernel, yes. > > But at the moment, there's no way for a board/kernel to select > the revision of binaries, right? > https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/blob/dora/recipes-multimedia/libfslvpuwrap/libfslvpuwrap_1.0.38.bb > > Or can we, for instance, have two recipes for the components, > e.g. > gpu-viv-bin-mx6q_3.5.7-1.0.0-alpha.2-hfp.bb > gpu-viv-bin-mx6q_3.10.9-1.0.0-alpha-hfp.bb > > and express PREFERRED_VERSION_gpu-viv-bin-mx6q=3.5.7-1.0.0-alpha.2 > in the linux-boundary_3.0.35.bb recipe and then set > PREFERRED_VERSION_gpu-viv-bin-mx6q=3.10.9-1.0.0-alpha.2 in a > linux-boundary_3.10.9.bb recipe? Based on Lauren's comments that the 3.10.9 binaries are ABI-compatible with the 3.0.35_4.1.0 release, and to allow testing of things, perhaps this is more appropriate: PREFERRED_VERSION_blah ?= 3.10.9-1.0.0-alpha Regards, Eric